Application Materials - Laserfiche WebLink

Pape Properties Inc - Headquarters Page 4 of 5 SR MOD– Written Statement June 26, 2026 The Satre Group • 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 686-4540 • www.satregroup.com The proposed removal of the small, ornamental trees along the primary entry walkway, as well as the removal and replacement of trees associated with safety improvements and maintenance of adjacent walkways and landscaped areas, does not alter the basis of the original Site Review decision and is not materially inconsistent with the approved development. The requested modification is limited in scope and does not affect the approved land use, site circulation, building design, parking layout, or other substantive elements of the development. Furthermore, the proposed modifications do not result in any changes that would affect compliance with the applicable approval criteria or conditions of approval associated with the original Site Review. The site remains consistent with the original Site Review approval and continues to comply with the intent and requirements of the approved development. 2. A transit shelter, bus stop, boarding pad and lighting shall be constructed according to the specifications provided by Lane County Transit District (LTD), according to the requirements of Section 9.593 of the Eugene Code. Finding: The applicant has previously complied with this condition. The applicant at the time of construction built a transit stop along Goodpasture Island Road that has a stop, pad, shelter and light. The proposed removal of the small, ornamental trees along the primary entry walkway, as well as the removal and replacement of trees associated with safety improvements and maintenance of adjacent walkways and landscaped areas, does not alter the basis of the original Site Review decision and is not materially inconsistent with the approved development. The requested modification is limited in scope and does not affect the approved land use, site circulation, building design, parking layout, or other substantive elements of the development. Furthermore, the proposed modifications do not result in any changes that would affect compliance with the applicable approval criteria or conditions of approval associated with the original Site Review. The site remains consistent with the original Site Review approval and continues to comply with the intent and requirements of the approved development. 3. The revised site plan, and landscaping plan shall be revised to reflect adequate vehicular access to the property to the north, tax lot #400. Finding: The applicant has previously complied with this condition, in that the applicant built a connection point near the entrance to the lot to the north. The proposed removal of the small, ornamental trees along the primary entry walkway, as well as the removal and replacement of trees associated with safety improvements and maintenance of adjacent walkways and landscaped areas, does not alter the basis of the original Site Review decision and is not materially inconsistent with the approved development. The requested modification is limited in scope and does not affect the approved land use, site circulation, building design, parking layout, or other substantive elements of the development. Furthermore, the proposed modifications do not result in any changes that would affect compliance with the applicable approval criteria or conditions of approval associated with the original Site Review. The site remains consistent with the original Site Review approval and continues to comply with the intent and requirements of the approved development. (2) The proposed modification will result in insignificant changes in the physical appearance of the development, the use of the site, and impact on the surrounding properties. Finding: As part of the original Site Review approval, Landscape Plan L1.1 identified the required landscaping and tree plantings necessary to satisfy the requirements of Eugene Code Section 9.589(2)(g), which required that trees be provided at a minimum ratio of one tree for every 3,000 square feet of paved vehicular use area. At the time of review, staff calculated approximately 88,450 square feet