Application Materials - Laserfiche WebLink

Pape Properties Inc - Headquarters Page 3 of 5 SR MOD– Written Statement June 26, 2026 The Satre Group • 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 686-4540 • www.satregroup.com III. SR MOD REVIEW – APPROVAL CRITERIA AND FINDINGS This section is presented in the same order of applicable requirements found in Section 9.8455 – Modifications to Approved Site Review Plan of the Eugene Code. Applicable sections of the Code are in italics, followed by proposed findings of facts in normal text. 9.8455 Modifications to Approved Site Review Plans. Modifications of the final approved site review plan may be requested following the Type II process. The planning director shall approve the request if it complies with the following criteria: (1) The proposed modification is not materially inconsistent with the conditions of the original approval; (2) The proposed modification will result in insignificant changes in the physical appearance of the development, the use of the site, and impact on the surrounding properties. Finding: For (1) above, there were two Site Reviews, SR 87-15 for a building that was built on what is now Lot 502 and SR 96-33 to construct a four-story, 59,000 sq ft building and associated parking and amenities including the decorative trees along the main walkway into the building. The conditions in SR 96-33 will be the conditions to review for the modification. Conditions of Approval for SR 96-33 – The Planning Director’s Decision for SR 96-33, issued on May 14, 1997, approved the Site Review Plan subject to three (3) conditions of approval. When considering a request to modify this Site Review, the Planning Director must determine that the proposed modification is not materially inconsistent with the conditions or with intent of the original approval, as required under criterion (1) above. Details • SR 96-33 – The original Site Review Plan case number. • May 14, 1997, Decision – The date the Planning Director issued the original approval with conditions. • 3 conditions of approval – The specific requirements that the applicant has to meet for the use to remain consistent with the land use code and findings. • Modification review – When an applicant requests changes to a previously approved SR, the Planning Director (or equivalent reviewing authority) must confirm that the modification does not substantially alter or conflict with the original conditions or findings. • "Not materially inconsistent" – This phrase means that the change cannot undermine the original basis for approval or the protections the conditions were meant to ensure (e.g., neighborhood compatibility, traffic, noise, etc.) Original Conditions of Approval 1. Site Review approval of the four-story Chambers Office Building at the proposed setback is contingent on the approval of the request to change the zoning of the adjacent R -2 Limited Multi- family Residential to PL Public Land. Finding: The applicant has previously complied with this condition of approval. As part of the original Site Review approval, a condition required the rezoning of the City -owned parcel from R-2 (Low-Density Residential) to PL (Public Land). The City subsequently initiated and approved Zone Change Application Z 97-018 in June 1997, thereby satisfying this condition.