My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Application Materials
>
OnTrack
>
SR
>
2026
>
SR 26-01
>
Application Materials
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2026 10:55:17 AM
Creation date
2/19/2026 10:54:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
SR
File Year
26
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
Lincoln Commons
Document Type
Application Materials
Document_Date
2/18/2026
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Applicant’s Written Statement - Lincoln Commons Site Review 16 <br /> <br /> <br />The subject site is not included in the City’s acknowledged Goal 5 inventory, so further analysis <br />is necessary under this criterion to address the provisions of EC 9.6880 through EC 9.6885 . The <br />following findings explain how the project is exempt from tree preservation requirements upon <br />a closer reading of these standards in detail. <br /> <br />The subject property is mostly paved, and only two trees exist along the edge of the site in the <br />northwest corner, one adjacent to West 5th Avenue and one along Lincoln Street. In accordance <br />with EC 9.6885(2), the Tree Preservation and Removal Standards would apply in the case of a <br />Site Review being processed under EC 9.8445 (as is the case here), unless exempt under EC <br />9.6885(2)(d). Because the site has less than 5 significant trees on site prior to development as <br />stated in subsection (2)(d)2., and since none of the provisions related to the South Hills or <br />Willamette River Greenway would otherwise apply, the project is exempt from EC 9.6885(2). <br />For this reason, no further analysis or tree preservation/mitigation plan is required to <br />demonstrate compliance with this criterion at EC 9.8445(3). <br /> <br />Based on the available information and findings above, EC 9.8445(3) is met. <br /> <br />EC 9.8445(4): The proposal complies with all of the following: <br /> <br />(a) EC 9.2000 through 9.4170 regarding lot dimensions and density requirements for <br />the subject zone and any applicable overlay zones. <br /> <br />The S-W zone provides the only lot standards and density requirements applicable to the <br />project. First and foremost, the maximum density allowance for residential projects like this <br />within the S-W zone are found at EC 9.3911(2). This provision states there is no minimum <br />density, but that the maximum density is according to the R-4 zone’s density requirements (112 <br />dwelling units per acre) from EC Table 9.2750. <br /> <br />As with the maximum building height discussed above, the applicant also relies here on an <br />approved Adjustment Review (see ARA 25-29) that grants an allowed increase in the maximum <br />allowable density for the Lincoln Commons project under the provisions of SB 1537 Section <br />(38)(4)(g)(C). As described in that adjustment request, the practical effect of the additional <br />height and other adjustments taken together is to allow additional dwelling units beyond the <br />112-dwelling unit per acre (du/ac) maximum established through EC 9.3911(2) and EC Table <br />9.2750. At approximately 0.55 acres in size, the maximum allowed density as previously <br />confirmed by the City would be 62 dwelling units for this development site. With the existing <br />approved adjustment, the project will be able to include a total of 75 units (a modest but critical <br />net increase of 13 units to help make the affordable housing project financially feasible). Again, <br />it is important to note that land use code provides that an approved adjustment to a standard <br />constitutes compliance with the standard. <br /> <br />Otherwise, there are no property line adjustments or land divisions currently proposed. No <br />changes are proposed that would affect the development site boundary as shown on the site <br />plans, consisting of three lots under common ownership by the applicant. As such, none of the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.