City of Eugene – Project Consultation Meeting <br />May 1, 2025 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />3. A previously submitted Legal Lot Verification (City file no. LL 25-15) is associated with the site and <br />an active application. Please provide a timeline for the City to issue a decision on LL 25-15. <br />If the decision has not yet been rendered at the time of the Project Consultation, does it <br />conceptually appear the legal lots are viable in the configuration submitted? Is there any <br />additional material which might help the city’s decision process? <br /> <br />4. Based on the attached previous communication with City Surveyor Jim Colton and our preliminary <br />research, it is the project team’s understanding that Tax Lot 7000 is a City owned parcel even <br />though on RLID, the parcel ownership is listed as ODOT. Please confirm. Will the City contact <br />LCOG to update RLID or is this something the Applicant should do? <br /> <br />5. The proposed project is anticipated to trigger a Traffic Impact Analysis, per EC 9.8670(1). Please <br />confirm or advise otherwise if a TIA is not required. <br /> <br />6. The site is not governed by a neighborhood refinement plan or applicable special area zones. As <br />noted above, this area of the City is within the Far West Neighborhood Association. However, the <br />site is not within the boundary of the Jefferson-Far West Refinement Plan. Please confirm. <br /> <br />7. A review of the City’s adopted Goal 5 natural resource inventories found that there are no natural <br />resources, such as wetlands and floodplains, which have been identified for local protection. Please <br />confirm. <br /> <br />8. As noted above, the site is in the C-2 zone. The C-2 zone includes base development standards at <br />EC 9.2170 that are applicable to all developments. These standards are supplemented with Special <br />Use Limitations at EC 9.2161. There are no special use limitations applicable to the site or <br />proposed use. Additionally, per EC 9.2173, the C-2 zone includes large facility standards that are <br />applicable to buildings with 25,000 square feet or more of floor area. At approximately 18,620 <br />square feet, the Large Commercial Facility standards are not applicable. Please confirm the <br />above interpretations are correct. <br /> <br />9. The existing West 6th Avenue and West 7th Avenue public rights-of-way (ROW) are wide and run <br />through a compact and growing part of the City’s urban core. The 4 existing paved travel lanes on <br />West 6th Avenue are approximately 46 feet and the 5 existing paved travel lanes on West 7th <br />Avenue are approximately 57 feet. Prior conversations with City staff suggest that these streets will <br />not be widened further. However, the ROW extends about 27 feet from the existing curbline to the <br />subject site’s property lines on both frontages. Currently, the existing vehicle sales lot has included <br />these ROW areas within the existing site fencing and displays cars in this area. In an effort to <br />address security concerns and enhance and maintain this ROW area located between the existing <br />curb and the subject site’s property lines; the project team proposes to place the following items <br />within this ROW area as shown on the attached Preliminary Architectural Site Plan. <br />· Fencing – The Applicant proposes to fence most of the site, similar to the existing fence that is <br />within the ROW (see photo below), with a 6-foot fence that has a concrete maintenance strip <br />close to the back of the sidewalk. The fence will not have gates or impact vision clearance at <br />the driveways.