23. The building located on Block P shall not exceed 35 feet in height within 50 feet of the <br />adjacent residentially zoned property, and shall be setback a minimum of 30 feet from <br />the adjacent residentially zoned property, pursuant to EC 9.2171(3) and (7). <br />This condition is not applicable to this phase of the development, as it does not include Block P. <br />24. The final PUD plans shall show compliance with the following standards: (An <br />approved adjustment shall constitute compliance.) <br />a. EC 9.2171(5)(d) and EC 9.2173(3)(a) and (b) for the buildings on Blocks L, M, <br />N and P. <br />b. EC 9.2173(8) Service and Loading Areas <br />c. EC 9.2173(6)(a), (d), (e) and (f) On-Site Pedestrian Circulation <br />d. EC 9.2173(10) Exterior Wall Articulation, Facades and Ground Window Floors <br />These conditions are not applicable, as the subject property is not zoned commercial. <br />e. EC 9.4530(6) Improvements Between Buildings and Streets <br />f. EC 9.5500 Multiple-Family Standards (except EC 9.5500(9) Open Space and <br />4)(b)) <br />As the final PUD plans show compliance with these standards, these conditions are satisfied. <br />g. EC 9.6105 Bicycle Parking Standards <br />According to the applicant's written statement, short term bike parking will be provided in the right- <br />of-way of Shadow View Drive and Tennyson Avenue. Long term bicycle parking will be provided <br />inside the buildings in a locked room, in a lockable enclosure or in lockers. The applicant proposes <br />that the final design and locations be submitted and reviewed at the time of building permit. Land <br />Use Management staff concurs with this approach, given the range of permitted uses in the <br />proposed buildings and corresponding bicycle parking requirements. As such, as a condition of <br />approval, at the time of building permit for each building or tenant space, bicycle parking shall be <br />provided in compliance with the applicable standards beginning at EC 9.6105 to account for the <br />uses at the time of development. <br />h. EC 9.6410 Motor Vehicle Parking Standards; Table 9.6410 Required Off Street <br />Motor Vehicle Parking; and EC 9.6430 Shared Off-Street Parking. Parking <br />counts for individual phases can be exceeded to accommodate future shared <br />parking for buildings not yet built. <br />Based on a detailed parking analysis submitted by the applicant, the parking lots associated with the <br />proposed buildings do not provide an adequate number of parking spaces for this phase of the <br />development. Taking into account the 50% parking reduction allowed by the /ND overlay zone (see <br />EC 9.6410(a)), the parking lot associated with Building D will not meet the minimum off-street <br />parking space requirements by 37 spaces and the parking lot associated with Building C will exceed <br />the minimum requirements by 9 spaces. Pursuant to EC 9.6430, the applicant is proposing to meet <br />the minimum parking requirements through the use of shared off-street parking with the lots to the <br />south, identified as Buildings A and B, which are in common ownership with the subject property. <br />As these lots are considered one development site in the context of the Eugene Code, the shared <br />parking proposal is permitted pursuant to EC 9.6410(1). As shown in the applicant's parking <br />Crescent Village Phase 3 (PDF 07-1 & ARA 07-1) June 2007 Page 7