My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Testimony Batch 2
>
OnTrack
>
CA
>
2024
>
CA 24-3
>
Testimony Batch 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2024 8:15:21 AM
Creation date
11/8/2024 8:14:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CA
File Year
24
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
Stormwater Code Amendments
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
11/7/2024
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Master Plan, these facilities are sufficiently sized to accommodate the future developed runoff from <br />this site. There are no natural drainage courses on-site or immediately downstream. Stormwater runoff <br />from the proposed development does not enter an open drainage course until it reaches the outfall at <br />the north end of Wildish Land. The proposed future stormwater runoff from the development site at <br />this location is less than 10% of the total combined future stormwater runoff from the <br />Willakenzie/County Farm Basin and will not significantly impact the natural drainage course. <br />Stormwater drainage is further addressed under EC 9.8320(11)(b). Public Works staff concludes this <br />information is adequate to demonstrate compliance with this criterion. <br />EC 9.8320(10) Lots proposed for development with one-family detached dwellings shall comply <br />with EC 9.2790 Solar Lot Standards or as modified according to subsection (11) <br />below. <br />As no single family detached dwellings are proposed, this criterion does not apply. <br />EC 9.8320(11) The PUD complies with all of the following (An approved adjustment to a standard <br />pursuant to the provisions beginning at EC 9.8015 of this land use code constitutes <br />compliance with the standard.): <br />a) EC 9.2000 through 9.3915 regarding lot dimensions and density requirements for <br />the subject zone. <br />The proposed density within the R-4 zoned portion of the site exceeds the minimum net density of 20 units <br />per acre, and does not exceed the maximum net density of 112 units per acres as required per Table 9.2750 <br />Residential Zone Development Standards. All lots within the R-4 zoned portion of the site exceed the <br />applicable Residential Zone Lot Standards of Table 9.2760, including minimum lot size (4,500 square <br />feet), minimum street frontage (20 feet) and minimum lot width (20 feet). <br />With the exception of one lot, identified as Lot 4 on the applicant's conceptual subdivision plan (Sheet P <br />1. 1), the lots within C-2 Community Commercial and GO General Office zones comply with the <br />applicable Commercial Zone Lot Standards of Table 9.2180, as the proposed lots exceed the minimum lot <br />area of 6,000 square feet, the minimum street frontage of 50 feet and the minimum lot width of 50 feet. <br />As proposed, the lot area of Lot 4 does not comply with the minimum requirement of 6,000 square feet. <br />As per EC 9.2181(1), a modification to lot area may be approved through a planned unit development. <br />The applicant has requested a modification to the minimum lot area to allow proposed Lot 4 to contain <br />4,770 square feet. The purpose of this modification is to allow for a separate lot for the retail shops <br />proposed adjacent to the major anchor store on Block A. Staff recommends the Hearings Official grant this <br />modification to allow for a high-degree in flexibility of the site design. Approval of this modification does <br />not preclude the applicant from not creating this separate lot. <br />Based on the above findings, the proposal complies with this criterion. <br />b) EC 9.6500 through EC 9.6510 Public Improvement Standards. <br />EC 9.6500 Easements: Public Works staff notes that existing public easements are identified on the <br />plans. The applicant has requested through this development proposal that the City vacate the eastern 6 <br />feet of the 20-foot wide public utility easement (PUE) that runs along the eastern boundary of the <br />subject property. Public Works staff notes that a 42" public stormwater pipe is located within 7 feet of <br />Staff Report for Crescent Village PUD (PDT 04-1) April 19, 2004 Page 25 of 54
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.