Application Materials - Laserfiche WebLink

Tentative Partition Plan for Mike Hagen – W. 25th Ave & Portland Alley Page | 6 9.6860 – Street Right-of-Way Map. Response: Based on Table 9.6870, the minimum right-of-way width for a local, medium-volume residential street is 50’-60’, with a minimum of 20’-34’ of paving width. W 25th Ave is a local, residential street with a right-of-way width of 50’ and a paving width of 35’. Portland Alley is an existing 12’ wide one-way alley which was dedicated to the City of Eugene in 1952 for use as a public alley with 12’ of right-of-way. 9.6865 – Transit Facilities. Response: The closest LTD stop is near the intersection of W 25th Avenue and S Willamette Street on the west side of S Willamette Street, LTD Route No. 24. 9.6870 – Street Width. Response: Based on Table 9.6870, the minimum street width for a local, medium-volume residential street is 50’-60’with a minimum of 20’-34’ of paving width. W 25th Ave is a local, residential street with a right-of-way width of 50’ and a paving width of 35’. Portland Alley is an existing 12’ wide one-way alley which was dedicated to the City of Eugene in 1952 for use as a public alley with 12’ of right-of-way. The proposal complies with EC 9.6870. 9.6873 – Slope Easements. Because of terrain, slope easements may be required to facilitate the construction of streets and alleys and protect the structural integrity of the constructed roadway. Slope easements shall be granted in addition to the required street or alley width listed in Table 9.6870 Right-of-Way and Paving Widths. Response: No slope easements are required as no construction of streets or alleys is proposed or required to be proposed with this tentative partition plan. 9.6875 – Private Street Design Standards. Response: No public or private streets are being proposed as part of this partition. EC 9.8215 Partition, Tentative Plan Approval Criteria – General (continued). (c) EC 9.6500 through EC 9.6505 Public Improvement Standards 9.6500 – Easements. (1) The city may require the dedication of easements for wastewater sewers and other public utilities, and for access thereto for maintenance, of a sufficient width to meet the intended use, provided the city makes findings to demonstrate consistency with constitutional requirements. Response: There are three existing easements on the subject property – they are indicated on the site plans as E1, E2, and E3. There is a 6’ joint reciprocal Maintenance Easement proposed on the boundary line between proposed Parcel 1 and proposed Parcel 2 to allow continued functionality for the existing structures after the partition. Please see the attached Tentative Partition plan set for details. (2) Easements may be required along lot or parcel rear lines or side lines, or elsewhere as necessary to provide needed facilities for present or future development of the area. Response: There are three existing easements on the subject property – they are indicated on the site plans as E1, E2, and E3. There is a 6’ joint reciprocal Maintenance Easement proposed on the boundary line between proposed Parcel 1 and proposed Parcel 2 to allow continued functionality for the existing structures after the partition. Please see the attached Tentative Partition plan set for details.