• • <br />improvement, which would need to include a 20' paving surface for two-way vehicular travel, a <br />6' setback sidewalk, and an 8' planting strip. The total right-of-way necessary to develop a half- <br />street in this instance would, therefore, be 34' wide. The indication is that the right-of-way <br />identified on the south boundary of Parcel 1 cannot be developed until the adjacent property to <br />the south is developed or additional right-of-way width is provided or acquired. <br />Referral comments from Public Works Engineering staff also note that there is a comment in the <br />applicant's revised written statement which merits further discussion. That statement reads: "At <br />the city's request the right-of-way dedication was included." The applicant proposed to sell <br />Parcel 1 to the City for use as a low-income housing site, with development of the parcel to be <br />delayed a minimum of five years. While recognizing that the development schedule and the <br />nature of the anticipated use do not provide a basis for modifying approval criteria, applicant <br />requested some flexibility in meeting requirements for construction of public improvements on <br />the development site. Staff agreed to investigate options, within the framework of the approval <br />criteria, in order to further adopted goals and policies related to providing a range of affordable <br />housing. Agreements on street layout, dedications, and the timing and responsibility for <br />construction of public improvements necessary to allow both parcels to develop consistent with <br />provisions of the code and with the funding mechanisms for the potential low-income housing <br />project were reached after numerous meetings between applicant, his representatives, and <br />Planning and Public Works staff. Staff did not require dedications simply as a response to a <br />partition application. <br />It is also noted that the applicant's proposal to use the street name "Sterling Drive", for the <br />proposed street along the south boundary of the site, is unacceptable. That street name is already <br />in use elsewhere in the City. <br />Section 9.050: Alleys <br />In the general area of this request, there are no public alleys that require continuation or extension <br />through or along the proposed partition. <br />Section 9.055: Blocks <br />Section 9.055(1) of the Eugene Code requires that block length for local residential streets shall <br />not exceed 600 feet, subject to certain exceptions. In this instance, the proposed residential street <br />segments for which right-of-way will be granted are less than 600 feet, in compliance with the <br />block length maximum. <br />Section 9.055(2) addresses public accessway requirements. In this instance, no additional public <br />accessways are required to comply with Section 9.055(2) of the Eugene Code. <br />Section 9.055(3) of the Eugene Code addresses easement dedication requirements for stormwater <br />facilities, sanitary sewers, and other public utilities. The applicant proposes to serve Parcel 1 <br />with a sewer to be located in an easement along the southerly boundary of Parcel 2. This <br />Findings and Decision (MP 00-3) January 11, 2001 3 <br />