My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Hearings Official Decision
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Hearings Official Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2018 4:02:00 PM
Creation date
5/15/2018 12:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Decision Document
Document_Date
5/15/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Following the introductory explanation, Associate Planner Nicholas Gioello and Senior Planner <br />Gabe Flock presented the planning staff's summary of the application. Following the staff <br />presentation, the applicant's representative, Carol Schirmer, and the applicant's attorney, Bill <br />Kloss, presented testimony on behalf of the applicants. Two individuals presented oral testimony <br />in favor of the application. Four individuals then presented `neutral' testimony that was neither <br />in support of or in opposition to the application.' Following the Joint Response Committee <br />(Response Committee) consolidated testimony, which included evidence and testimony from <br />five representatives of that committee. Because of the volume of evidence and testimony <br />committee members wished to present, the hearings official granted the Response Committee <br />additional time beyond the allowed 30-minutes. Following the Response Committee <br />presentation, 22 individuals testified in opposition to the proposed PUD.3 An additional `neutral' <br />comment was then also permitted. The applicant then presented rebuttal testimony. <br />At the close of the public testimony, the record was left open for a period of 14 days, until 5:00 <br />pm on March 21, 2018, for additional testimony and evidence; until 5:00 pm March 30, 2018 for <br />evidence and testimony responding to the additional testimony and evidence submitted during <br />the initial open record period; and until 5:00 pm April 6, 2018 for the applicant's rebuttal <br />argument related to the new testimony and evidence. <br />B. Site Characteristics <br />The subject property includes 13.63 acres located at the end of Capital Hill Drive, in both the <br />Laurel Hill Valley and Fairmount neighborhoods. The surrounding residential neighborhoods are <br />developed with primarily single-family homes, primarily to the west and south, many located on <br />steep slopes. Hendricks Park, an 80+ acre public park abuts the subject property to the northeast. <br />The publicly-owned Ribbon Trail abuts the property to the east. Portions of the subject property <br />are steeply sloped, with slopes exceeding 40% of the eastern portion of the property abutting the <br />Ribbon Trail. The site currently consists of five tax lots, which are developed with six residential <br />units (three single family dwellings and one three-unit dwelling.) <br />The site characteristics are more fully described below within the context of the applicable <br />approval criteria. <br />C. Description of Request <br />The applicant requests approval for a tentative residential Planned Unit Development (PUD). <br />The applicant requests review of the proposed development based on the city's general approval <br />criteria (EC 9.8320 et seq) rather than the needed housing approval criteria (EC 9.8325). <br />The proposed PUD includes the existing five tax lots, three of which are developed with existing <br />z The hearing official notes that one of the individuals who stated she was presenting neutral testimony was actually <br />presenting a single issue on which she considered her position neutral, and also later testified in opposition to the <br />proposed PUD itself. <br />3 The names of the individuals who presented oral testimony and who presented written testimony, before, during or <br />after the public hearing are on file in the City's planning records for this application. <br />Hearings Official Decision (PDT 17-1) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.