Hearings Official Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

residential structures, as well as proposed lots for single family detached and single family attached units. In total, the requested PUD proposes the addition of 28-32 units, for a total of 34- 38 units on the subject property. The proposed PUD consists primarily of single family detached housing, with two of the 34 lots proposed for single-family attached units, on which the applicant proposes to include a maximum of three units. Currently, one tax lot is developed with an unpermitted multi-family structure, which is subject to a city enforcement order. Compliance with that enforcement order requires removal of the multi-family units. To address the enforcement order, the applicant proposes to divide that tax lot into two lots by adding a lot line through the existing building. The proposed PUD also includes improvement of an existing public street and the addition of a private street, with associated infrastructure. The proposed site plan includes designation of common open space areas, tree preservation areas on some individual lots, and several shared access driveways. D. Requests to Withdraw or Exclude Evidence 1. Requests to withdraw evidence Two individuals have requested that evidence submitted into the record be withdrawn from the record. Through an email dated March 14, 2018, Ms. Tiffany Edwards requested to withdraw testimony submitted on March 7, 2018 on behalf of the Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce. According to the withdrawal request, a letter from the Chamber of Commerce "was inadvertently submitted by email that included a series of forwarded entails unrelated to the statements that the Chamber CEO * * * had intended to submit." Through an email dated March 21, 2018, Mr. Paul Conte requests that two entails he submitted to the city be excluded, one dated March 1, 2018 and the second dated March 7,2018. According to Mr. Conte he instructed the city staff that these entails were not to be included in the record. Both requests are granted and those documents will be withdrawn from the record of this application. 2. Requests to Exclude or Ignore Evidence a. Request to Limit S'taffReport based on violation of ORS 197.763 In correspondence dated March 21, 2018 and March 28, 2018, Mr. Paul Conte alleges the Staff Report for this application violates ORS 197.763. He asserts either that the final Staff Report for the proposed PUD was not available seven days before the public hearing, or that the version of the Staff Report that was available seven days before the public hearing was not the same version as presented to the hearings official at the public hearing. Mr. Conte states that edits were, or may have been, made between the Staff Report issued February 28th and the Staff Report available at the hearing. Mr. Conte also challenges the Staff Report's "incorporation" of public Hearings Official Decision (PDT 17-1) 6