ResponseCommitteeestimatesthattheproposedprojectwillcontainapproximately1,360SFof <br />parkingspaceareaforLots20,33and34. <br />Basedontheaboveargumentsandeventhoughthe8/22/17Applicationtoutsthebenefitsofthe <br />so-calledCommonPreservationAreasandIndividualPreservationAreas,theyposeasevere <br />safetythreatandareneitherreadilyphysicallynorvisuallyaccessibletotheresidentsofthe <br />proposedPUD.Theproposedprojectisneithersafenorsuitableforsmallchildrenorseniorsin <br />thatallso-called“preservation”areasarenot“preserved”for(all)residents,especiallythevery <br />youngandtheelderlywhocouldhavephysicalorage-relatedlimitations.TheApplication <br />proposesnosafeguardsfortheseareas. <br />THEREFORE,THERESPONSECOMMITTEEPROPOSESAMOREACCURATE <br />ALTERNATIVECALCULATIONOFNETDENSITYASSHOWNBELOW: <br />FromtheApplication’s13.10projectacres(570,636SF),aftertheeliminationoftheCupola <br />Drivearea,thefollowingadjustmentsshouldbemadebeforecalculatingnetdensity: <br />Subtractthe2.08acres(90,619SF)ofso-calledIndividualPreservationAreas; <br />Subtractthe2.46acres(107,331SF)ofso-calledCommonPreservationAreas; <br />Subtractthe6,450estimatedSFofaccesslanes; <br />Subtractthe10,000estimatedSFofsidewalks;and <br />Subtractthe1,360estimatedSFforparkingforLots20,33and34. <br />Afterthesesubtractions,anadjusted,moreaccurate354,876SF(8.15acres)isderivedto <br />utilizeinthenetdensitycalculation. <br />Giventheproposed34to38projectunits,netdensityincreasesfromtheApplication’sstated <br />2.6to2.9units/acretoamoreprecisedensityof4.17to4.66units/acre. <br />TheApplicantstatesthattheproject’sdensity“iswellwithinthemaximumof5unitsper <br />acre…”However,toanyonewhowillliveinorwalk/drivethroughtheproposedproject, <br />densitytotheeverydayuserwillappeartobeclosertothemaximumof5unitsperacre.Inan <br />efforttocamouflagetheincontrovertiblemassiveneighborhoodimpactoftheproposedPUD,the <br />Applicanthasgrosslyunderstatedactualdensitybyapproximately59%. <br />Additionally,theResponseCommitteequestionswhyLots18(18,400SF)and19(21,023SF) <br />areincludedinthenetdensitycalculation.EventhoughbothLots18and19areownedbythe <br />ApplicantandareincludedintheproposedPUD’slotcount,theyneitherphysicallyabutthe <br />developmentsitesoftheother32lotsnoraretheyphysicallyvisiblefromtheother32lots.The <br />mid-lineofLot19isapproximately300feet(afootballfield)fromthesouthernedgeofLot17. <br />Werethesetwolottobedeductedfromthemainproperty,theCommittee’sabovenetdensity <br />calculation4.17to4.66unitsperacrewouldincreaseto4.70unitsperacre(usinga34unittotal) <br />to5.25unitsperacre(usinga38unittotal).Theproposedprojectwouldbeatorabovethe <br />maximum5unitsperacreallowedbytheEugeneCodeforpropertyzonedR-1. <br />102 <br /> <br />