My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Employment, Parks, Schools Ordinance (County) (all other)- Planning Commission Recommendation (3 of 4)
>
OnTrack
>
CA
>
2017
>
CA 17-1
>
Employment, Parks, Schools Ordinance (County) (all other)- Planning Commission Recommendation (3 of 4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 1:48:03 PM
Creation date
5/22/2017 2:16:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CA
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
UGB ADOPTION PACKAGE
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
5/22/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Eugene Urban Growth Boundary Study <br />Industrial Land Evaluation <br />Subarea P2.10: Site Characteristics of Unconstrained Land <br /> <br />~ <br />l <br />i <br />V <br />I <br />p <br /> <br />y <br />n. <br />C <br />n <br />Q. <br />0 <br />•......r.._..._..~..~. <br />Current UGB <br />f-** <br />~.a 1 <br />i ''N <br />i <br />Subarea Boundary <br />Current Eugene UGB <br />Taxlots <br />Street Rights of Way <br />Major Streets <br />Designated Freight Route <br />Streets within a Mile of Freight Route Access <br />C Constrained Land <br />Displayed Site Characteristics of Unconstrained Land <br />- Sites More than 7 Mile from Freight Route <br />-r <br />® Sites of Insufficient Size within 7 Mn4e of Freight. Route '.d <br />- Second Priority Land for Further Consideration (None) Eugene <br />Second Priority Land Pending Fourth Prronty Analysis <br />IYnfe.^ This »M'p Is 6'"" air Irnprcals soar" etmta, sttb)r f do eh•Altyr. Jrfd Pyr g.rxrrrl tVfVtVHCC omit'.. <br />Subarea P2.10 Summary. Based on these findings, the City has determined that none of the land in <br />Subarea P2.10 is suitable for industrial expansion without combining it with suitable lower priority land. <br />The three sites noted as candidates for further consideration will be analyzed for inclusion in association <br />with adjacent fourth priority land under Section 2(f)8 below. <br />Appendix B to Findings May 2017 Page 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.