My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Hearings Official Decision
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Hearings Official Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 4:04:03 PM
Creation date
12/4/2015 9:54:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE
Document Type
Hearings Official Decision
Document_Date
12/3/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As an informational item, staff notes this exception does not apply to solar setback requirements at <br />EC 9.2795, which would be subsequently addressed as part of the building permit process for future <br />development of the proposed lots. <br />Based on these findings, this criterion is met. <br />EC 9.8325(11): The PUD complies with all applicable development standards explicitly <br />addressed in the application except where the applicant has shown that a modification is <br />consistent with the purposes as set out in EC 9.8300 Purpose of Planned Unit Development. <br />The applicant's written statement references a paving width for the shared access easement of 28 <br />feet to allow for fire access and parking on both sides. As an informational item, staff notes that on- <br />site fire access and the proposed parking along the private driveway would be subject to further <br />review for compliance with applicable standards at the time of future permitting processes. <br />Otherwise, there appear to be no other development standards explicitly addressed in the <br />application, nor any requests for "modification" to standards under this criterion. <br />Based on these findings, this criterion is met. <br />EC 9.8325(12): For any PUD located within or partially within the boundaries of the South Hills <br />Study, the following additional approval criteria apply: <br />(a) No development shall occur on land above an elevation of 900 feet except that one <br />dwelling may be built on any lot in existence as of August 1, 2001. <br />The subject property is below 900 feet in elevation (the highest elevation is 842 feet). <br />(b) Development shall be setback at least 300 feet from the ridgeline unless there is a <br />determination by the city manager that the area is not needed as a connection to the <br />city's ridgeline trail system. For purposes of this section, the ridgeline trail shall be <br />considered as the line indicated as being the urban growth boundary within the South <br />Hills Study plan area. <br />The subject property is located more than 300 feet from the south hills ridgeline and thus complies <br />with this standard. <br />(c) Development shall cluster buildings in an arrangement that results in at least 40% of the <br />development site being retained in 3 or fewer contiguous common open space areas. <br />For purposes of this section, the term contiguous open space means open space that is <br />uninterrupted by buildings, structures, streets, or other improvements. <br />The development provides contiguous common open space which is configured consistent with the <br />above approval criterion. The applicant notes that the common open space constitutes 2.18 acres of <br />the 4.45-acre property. This results in 49% of the development site shown as common open space. <br />Staff notes that this figure of 4.45 acres is not consistent with the 5.19 gross acres noted elsewhere in <br />the application materials. Using the larger "gross acres" figure, the development site includes 42% of <br />Hearings Official Decision (PDT 15-1/ ARA 15-13) 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.