PDF Page 90 <br />o Prior to Final PUD approval the site plans will demonstrate that access connections to <br />lots whose frontage is on that portion of the street with grades over 15% is feasible. <br />(g) EC 9.6750 Special Setback Standards. <br />No special setbacks are required in this instance. <br />(h) EC9.6775 Underground Utilities. <br />The Staff Report, at page 49, notes that the plans show all on-site utilities will be placed <br />underground, consistent with this standard. <br />(i) EC9.67S0 Vision Clearance Area. <br />The Staff Report, at page 49, notes that Sheet 7.5 depicts vision clearance areas (VCA) at each <br />of the public intersections and Sheet 7.6 details typical low screen plantings with a maximum <br />height of 18". The staff says that these standards for vision clearance would be subject to <br />further review at the time the corner lots development is reviewed during building permit <br />submittal. <br />O) EC 9.6791 through 9.6797 regarding storm water destination, pollution <br />reduction, flow control for headwaters area, oil control, source control, <br />easements, and operation and maintenance. <br />See discussion earlier in this document under EC 9.8320 (11). <br />The Staff Report, at page 50, has this to say about the Applicant's plans to comply with the <br />stormwater standards: <br />Referral comments from Public Works staff include a review of the applicant's <br />stormwater analysis prepared by Nathan Patterson, P.E., Branch Engineering, <br />which identifies the existing conditions and identifies 5 proposed storm drainage <br />basins on the site (see Applicant's Attachment 4). <br />Regarding standards at EC 9.6791 Stormwater Destination and EC 9.6793 <br />Stormwater Flow Control, since Basins 1 and 2 (on the west portion of the site) <br />drain directly to headwater streams, flow control is required for those systems. <br />The analysis indicates that post development flows to the headwater streams <br />from areas identified as Basins 1 and 2 will be limited to pre-development levels <br />by means of detention systems. Metered discharge from the detention systems <br />would be directed to designated outfall areas constructed consistent with City <br />standards in order to reduce the velocity of stormwater entering the headwater <br />streams. The proposal indicates that runoff from the new impervious surfaces of <br />Laurel Ridge Applicant Final Argument - Page 56 <br />139 <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) <br />Page 894 <br />