PDF Page 89 <br />inventory. <br />The Staff Report, at page 48, agrees that this standard does not apply, as provided for in EC <br />9.6710(3), because the subject property is included on the City's acknowledged Goal 5 <br />inventory. <br />(e) EC 9.6730 Pedestrian Circulation On-Site. <br />The Staff Report, at page 48, that the Application complies with this standard, as reflected by <br />Sheet 3.0 of the plans. <br />(f) EC 9.6735 Public Access Required. <br />(2) Except as otherwise provided in this land use code, no building or structure <br />shall be erected or altered except on a lot fronting or abutting on a public street <br />or having access to a public street over a private street or easement of record <br />approved in accordance with provisions contained in this land use code. <br />The Staff Report notes, at page 49, that 12 lots will have no frontage on a public or private <br />street, hence do not meet the 50-foot frontage requirement so Table EC9.2760, In a PUD, lots <br />with no frontage are allowed if there is an access easement. The Staff Report for The Jewel <br />PUD found the same omission in the plans and resolved it with this condition: <br />The final PUD plans shall be revised to provide an access easement for each lot with no <br />frontage or with reduced frontage and shared access, (See The Jewell on Bailey Hill, <br />PDT 08-1 (Oct. 24, 2008) at 25; Prehearing Exhibit 3-1.4.) <br />(2) Access from a public street to a development site shall be located in accordance <br />with EC 7.420 Access Connections - Location. If a development will increase the <br />development site's peak hour trip generation by less than 50% and will generate less <br />than 20 additional peak hour trips, the development site's existing access connections <br />are exempt from this standard: <br />The Staff Report, at page 49, notes that, with respect to EC 7.420(1)(b), driveways may not be <br />permitted on streets with grades over 15%, and there are several areas with grades in excess of <br />15%. Therefore, the proposal needs to demonstrate that access connections at these locations <br />are feasible. <br />Staff has not read the plans correctly. Information showing compliance with the 15% driveway <br />grade standard is shown on Plan Sheet 3.0. As shown and noted, the direction of driveway <br />location and driveway travel are indicated for each single-family homesite (the small triangles). <br />These have been located to avoid the 15% gradient street sections. <br />Notwithstanding having made the showing of compliance, the Applicant is fine with a condition <br />of approval as follows: <br />LaurelRidge Applicant Final Argument - Page 55 <br />138 <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 893 <br />