6 <br />1 parking" (and therefore cannot enforce no parking) because the City does not <br />2 maintain unimproved streets, such as Oakleigh Lane. Rec 1172. <br />3 Oakleigh Lane is over 1,000 feet long; and the distance from River Road <br />4 to the proposed development's only vehicular access point is over 850 feet <br />5 (Rec 1439 and see Exhibit A), which is over twice the City's 400-foot limit on <br />6 the length of a cul-de-sac. Rec 9, 40. There are no connecting streets between <br />7 Oakleigh Lane and East Hilliard Lane (which is parallel and to the north) or <br />8 McLure Lane (which is parallel and to the south), and any future connecting <br />9 street is precluded due to existing residential development. Rec 1262. <br />10 Increased traffic volume from the proposed PUD <br />11 There are 21 fully-developed residential properties, 19 of which are single- <br />12 family homes, along both sides of Oakleigh Lane. Rec 864, 1439. <br />13 According to the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation <br />14 Manual, 9th Edition, the Average Daily Trip (ITE-ADT) rate per dwelling for <br />15 single-family, detached dwellings is 9.52. (ITE-ADT measures roundtrips.) <br />16 Thus, the estimated total ITE-ADT for the 19 current households is <br />17 180.88 (19 x 9.52). Rec 864. These trips would be distributed among the <br />18 current homes, which are spread out along the entire length of Oakleigh Lane. <br />19 The ITE-ADT rate per dwelling for condominiums (ITE "use type" 230) <br />20 is 5.81. Thus, the estimated total ITE-ADT for the 29 new dwellings in the <br />