I proposed PUD is 168.49 (29 x 5.81). Ibid. Almost all of these roundtrips by <br />2 PUD residents and visitors would travel the entire length of Oakleigh Lane. <br />3 The resulting total traffic volume on Oakleigh Lane would thus almost <br />4 double (1.9 times) from the current 181 ITE-ADT to a projected 350 ITE-ADT. <br />5 The City determines appropriate street standards based on ranges of daily <br />6 one-way trips, referred to as "Average Daily Traffic" ("City-ADT"),' as shown <br />7 in ASCP Table 2 in Exhibit B. The projected traffic volume of 700 City-ADT <br />8 would put traffic volume on Oakleigh Lane at the high end of the City's range <br />9 (250-750 City-ADT) for a "Low-Volume Residential Street." Rec 448-449. <br />10 The full impact of vehicle trips on Oakleigh Lane residents, other <br />11 drivers, and pedestrians and bicyclists is directly proportional to the number of <br />12 residences passed and other travelers encountered on the road. For comparison <br />13 purposes, a relatively good approximation of the total impact of one trip is the <br />14 number of residences passed by the vehicle making a trip. For example, a trip <br />15 to or from the residence closest to River Road would pass no other residence; <br />16 whereas a trip to or from the proposed development site would pass 18 <br />17 residences. Tallying the cumulative "pass-by" counts, the 19 current single- <br />Because Oakleigh Lane has only one way in and out, City-ADT (one-way) <br />values are exactly twice ITE-ADT (roundtrip) values. <br />