3 <br />1 THIRD ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR <br />2 Decision erred in finding the proposed PUD would be reasonably compatible <br />3 and harmonious with adjacent and nearby land uses, as EC 9.8320(13) requires. <br />4 C. SUMMARY OF MATERIAL FACTS <br />5 Conte accepts Petitioners' Summary of Material Facts, with additions infra. <br />6 The proposed PUD will result in 29 new dwellings. Rec 41, 44. "[T]he <br />7 additional 29 residential units will increase the number of structures that access <br />8 this [sic] Oakleigh Lane by over 100 percent." Rec 1257. <br />9 The east boundary of the subject property abuts undeveloped City <br />10 parkland. Otherwise, the surrounding properties consist primarily of single- <br />I1 family dwellings on individual lots or undeveloped lots that have potential for <br />12 future residential development (i.e. at the north end of Oakleigh Lane and <br />13 abutting the west boundary of the subject property). Rec 24, 662-663. <br />14 Oakleigh Lane - substandard conditions and not maintained <br />15 All of the 29 proposed PUD dwellings will be accessible only from Oakleigh <br />16 Lane. Rec 41, 44. Oakleigh Lane will provide the sole emergency access to the <br />17 development. Rec 24. There are no planned streets within a quarter mile of the <br />18 proposed PUD site. Rec 1439. The proposed PUD site is the furthest property <br />19 from River Road on the south side of the street. Ibid. <br />20 Oakleigh Lane is a narrow, substandard, dead-end lane, partially under <br />