Rest Haven TPR Analysis (14-206) <br /> March 31, 2015 <br />The following table summarizes the estimated peak hour trips generated by the site under the <br />reasonable worst case development scenarios for the existing and proposed zoning and use <br />designations. <br /> <br />Table 3: PM Peak Hour Trip Generation <br /> Trips <br />Trips Entering <br />Number Total <br />Leaving <br />Land Use: Rate/Unit <br />of Units Trips <br /># % # % <br /> <br />Existing Zoning and Metro Plan Use Designations PM Peak Hour Trip Generation <br />Cemetery 0.84 Trips/ 27.63 <br />23 8 33% 15 67% <br />(ITE Code 566) Acre acres <br />Regional Park 0.2 Trips/ 46.27 <br />9 4 45% 5 55% <br />(ITE Code 417) Acre acres <br />Total Existing Zoning and Metro Plan Trips: <br />32 12 38% 20 62% <br />Proposed Zoning and Metro Plan Use Designations PM Peak Hour Trip Generation <br />Cemetery 0.84 Trips/ 27.63 <br />23 8 33% 15 67% <br />(ITE Code 566) Acre Acres <br />Single Family Residential (ITE 1.00 Trips/ 231 <br />231 146 63% 85 37% <br />Code 210) Dwelling Units <br />Total Proposed R-1 Zoning and LDR Use Trips: 254 154 61% 100 39% <br /> New PM Peak Hour Trips <br />Build-Out of Existing PL Zoning and Uses : 9 4 45% 5 55% <br />Build-Out of Proposed R-1 Zoning and LDR Uses: 231 146 63% 85 37% <br />Difference between Land Uses: 222 142 80 <br />As shown in the table, accounting for existing traffic generated by the cemetery use on the site, <br />the existing zoning would allow up to 9 new PM peak hour (design hour) trips generated by the <br />site and the proposed zoning would allow up to 231 new PM peak hour trips generated by the <br />site. The difference between build-out of the reasonable worst case development scenarios could <br />include up to 222 additional PM peak hour trips with the proposed low density residential uses <br />and R-1 residential zoning when compared to the existing public land zoning with a parks use. <br />The metro plan amendment represents a greater difference in allowable use permissions and trip <br />generation than the zone change because the existing zoning would theoretically support low <br />density residential uses if it was consistent with the use permissions of the metro plan and its <br />allowed uses for the portion of the site south of E. 40 Avenue. Therefore the reasonable worst <br />th <br />case development scenario for the metro plan amendment also applies to the reasonable worst <br />case development scenario for the zone change application. <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />© Branch Engineering, Inc. <br />