My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC COMMENT
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
PUBLIC COMMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2017 4:04:55 PM
Creation date
9/18/2017 11:43:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
9/18/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JANISCH Amy C <br />From: GIOELLO Nick R <br />Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 10:05 AM <br />To: JANISCH Amy C <br />Subject: FW: Capital Hill PUD <br />Follow Up Flag: Follow up <br />Flag Status: Flagged <br />Please add this to Ontrack for Capital Hill PUD per Mr. Conte's request <br />From: Paul Conte [mailto:paul.t.conte@gmail.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 12:55 PM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R <Nick.R.Gioello@ci.eugene.or.us> <br />Subject: Re: Capital Hill PUD <br />Nick, <br />Please enter the entire contents of this message into the record for PDT 17-1 (Capital Drive). <br />The earlier documents appear to be cleared up. If I understand correctly: <br />• The initial PWD referral was solely the checklist. There was no narrative analysis (other than <br />in comments on the checklist) <br />• The initial Fire Marshal referral was the multi-page document, including citations to Eugene <br />Fire Code. <br />• PWD submitted brief comments which you paraphrased in the completeness letter. <br />More recently: <br />• As I understand it, PWD has not submitted any further documents or had further discussions <br />regarding the plans. <br />• Based on some discussions, the applicant has submitted revised plans. The street plans are <br />in L6.0, dated 8-22-17. <br />Could you please confirm the above? <br />I have some questions regarding the discussion with the Deputy Fire Marshal and the revised plans: <br />• Is there any written record of the revised analysis supporting the two changes you identified? If not, <br />why <br />are <br />the <br />explanations of these <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.