changes <br />not publicly documented <br />• What is the precise extent of "last section of Capital Drive" that was determined could "remain <br />unimproved"? <br />• Drawing L6.0 identifies "Proposed Road Widening Pervious Pavement." What is the spec for "pervious <br />pavement," and specifically does it support the loads necessary to meet the Eugene Fire Code <br />requirements for a "fire apparatus access road"? <br />• The earlier comments that you paraphrased from PWD indicated the sections of Capital Drive that <br />would have to be improved would have to be reconstructed, not just a strip of pavement added. Is this <br />still the position of PWD and Planning staff? <br />• On page 3 of the most recent narrative, it states: "See attached and revised Traffic Safety and Street <br />Connectivity Study." The revised "Tentative PUD Application" indicates a revised "Traffic Safety and <br />Street Connectivity Study submitted with this Revised Written Statement August 22, 2017." I didn't <br />find the revised study on-line. <br />• On page 5, same document. A 20-foot pavement meets LVR standard without parking on <br />either side. To meet the standard, the segment would have to be signed with "no parking" <br />and enforced. <br />Thank you for the additional information. <br />Paul <br />El <br />On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:28 AM, GIOELLO Nick R <Nick. R. Gioello gci. eugene. or. us> wrote: <br />Paul, <br />I'm not sure if you are having problems viewing documents from the web site. It is true that the folder titled <br />"Application Completeness Review Letter (3/31/2017)" does not initially show up like all other documents but there is a <br />hyper link that lets you download it. That letter was the first round of review and includes the Planning checklist, Public <br />Works checklist and Fire Department comments. I have attached it in case you could not view it or download it. <br />The second review was my letter dated 6-26-17, and as I explained in another email to you, I took Public Works <br />comments that came from Eric Favreau via email and cut/pasted them into this letter. There were no additional written <br />Fire Department comments for the second review. <br />