Application Materials - Laserfiche WebLink

Kim ley))) Horn Page 9 Applicant Response: This consistency memo addresses and confirms compliance with all applicable development standards for the proposed Minor Partition in the C-2 zone. (1) The applicable adopted plan policies beginning at EC 9.9500. Applicant Response: The Metro Plan and Willakenzie Area Plan are the adopted plans applicable to the subject property. There are no specific policies within these plans, as detailed in EC 9.9560 and 9.9700, which would constitute approval criteria for the Project. Accordingly, the proposed Minor Partition - Tentative complies with the requirements in this Section. An approved adjustment to a standard pursuant to the provisions beginning at EC 9.8015 of this land use code constitutes compliance with the standard. (2) The proposed partition will not create anew nonconforming situation. Applicant Response: The proposed partition will not create a new nonconforming situation. The proposed Minor Partition - Tentative does not include any new physical development on the subject property, and the findings below are intended to address the development standards that could potentially be affected by the creation of new parcel boundaries: EC 9.2170(4), Setbacks The subject property is located within the C-2 zone and development is subject to the applicable setbacks in Table 9.2170, The subject property and all surrounding parcels are located within the C-2 zone and, pursuant to EC 9.2170(4)(d), are not subject to a minimum interior yard setback requirement. All proposed parcels include existing development and no building additions or alterations are proposed. The proposed Minor Partition -Tentative will not reduce or increase the existing front yard setback areas; therefore, the Project will not exacerbate any existing or create any new setback non -conformities. 9.2170(5), Landscaping The proposed Minor Partition — Tentative does not include any new buildings, additions, or alterations; therefore, the landscaping requirements in EC 9.2170(5) do not apply and the Project will not create any new nonconforming situations. (3) Partitions abutting collector and arterial streets comply with access management guidelines of the agency having jurisdiction over the street. Applicant Response: No new streets, alleys, or driveways are proposed; therefore, the proposed Minor Partition - Tentative complies with the relevant access management guidelines. (4) if the provisions of EC 9.8215(1) require a public street, or if the applicant proposes the creation of a public street, ail of the following criteria also apply: Applicant Response: The proposed Minor Partition -Tentative does not require, and the Applicant is not proposing, a new public street. The criteria in this Section do not apply. (5) As far as is practicable, lot side lines run at right angles to the street upon which the lots face, except that on curved streets they are radial to the curve. Applicant Response: Proposed Parcels 2 and 3 include side lot lines that run at right angles to their front lot lines with Valley River Way, in compliance with the requirement in this Section. With the exception of the lot area utilized to create Parcels 2 and 3, Parcel 1 retains its existing property lines. (6) On R-1 zoned property...