Application Materials - Laserfiche WebLink

Braewood Hills 3rd Addition PUD (PDT 24-1 and ST 24-3) Page 7 of 14 Standards Review Application: Written Statement September 5, 2025 Schirmer Consulting, LLC · PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 · (541) 234-5108 Landscape Architecture + Land Use Planning STANDARDS REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT The following are the applicable sections found in EC 9.8460 – 9.8474 Standards Review and EC 9.4930 – 9.4980 /WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay. Criteria are in regular type face and responses are in italics. Project Overview The subject property encompasses over 15 acres designated as a residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) and subdivision. Within this area lies a resource identified under Statewide Planning Goal 5, which pertains to the conservation of natural resources, scenic and historic areas, and open spaces. To facilitate the development, the applicant proposes the extension of Randy Lane through the southern portion of the property. This proposed public road crosses the Goal 5 resource area. Therefore, as a condition of approval, the applicant must submit a Standards Review application to assess and mitigate potential impacts on the Goal 5 resource. The Goal 5 Resource (a stream) currently flows into an existing 12” stormwater pipe that deposits the water in Videra Park. This stormwater pipe will not be disturbed, unless portion so fit need to be replaced due to age related degradation, during the construction of Randy Lane and will be integrated into the road infrastructure as would any other utility. Consequently, no culvert will be required. The primary disturbance within the Goal 5 area will result from the grading and construction activities with the required road extension. Existing plants will be removed and native plants will be installed. See lists below identifying existing plants to be removed and replacement planting. See Site Plan for location of plant removal and replacement planting.. Existing plants to be removed (per Wetlands and Wildlife, LLC) The dominant grass species is Schedonorus arundinaceus, a non-native hay grass. Rubus armeniacus and Dipsacus fullonum dominate the area surrounding the upslope stormwater pipe. Minor components (trace) include Sidalcea asprella ssp. Virgata (native), Camassia leichtlinii (native), Juncus patens, Allium amplectens (native). The existing trees are either apple or pear are non-native. Proposed planting (per Wetlands and Wildlife, LLC) I recommend replanting/seeding with: · Deschampsia caespitosa – Tufted Hair Grass. · Festuca californica – California fescue · Koeleria macrantha – Prairie Junegrass · Hordeum brachyantherum – Meadow Barley Native tree replacement could be: · Quercus garryana – Oregon White Oak · Pinus ponderosa v. benthamiana – Willamette Valley Ponderosa Pine · Calocedrus decurrens – Incense Cedar · Malus fusca – Pacific Crabapple EC 9.8470 Standards Review Approval Criteria The decision maker shall determine whether the application is in compliance with the standards set out in the code section that calls for the Standards Review. Condition 18 of the Planning Commissions Final Order: Braewood Hills 3rd Addition (PDT 24-1 and ST 24-3) states: Prior to Final PUD approval, the applicant shall obtain Type II Standards Review approval for the proposed public street extension of Randy Lane and any other utility crossings or other allowed improvements within the protected /WR conservation area, subject to the applicable standards at EC 9.4900 – 9.4980. A Type II Standards Review application is required. 9.8472 Standards Review – Application Requirements. In addition to the provisions in EC 9.7010 Application Filing, applications for uses subject to standards review under EC 9.4780(3) or EC 9.4930(3) shall be subject to the following requirements: