My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Testimony Batch 3
>
OnTrack
>
CA
>
2024
>
CA 24-3
>
Testimony Batch 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2025 11:36:52 AM
Creation date
2/28/2025 11:36:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CA
File Year
24
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
Stormwater Code Amendments
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
1/28/2025
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />GEPPER Jeffrey A <br />From:Dane Butler <dane@butlerhomes.net> <br />Sent:Friday, November 22, 2024 8:10 PM <br />To:Eugene Planning; JEROME Emily N; BRAUD Denny; RODRIGUES Matt J; HOEY Rich; <br />HUNTER Alissa <br />Cc:GEPPER Jeffrey A; SINGER Doug K; WALCH Therese; mreeder@oregonlanduse.com <br />Subject:Stormwater Ordinance <br />Follow Up Flag:Follow up <br />Flag Status:Flagged <br />[EXTERNAL ❚❛❜] <br />Dear Planning Commission, City Attorney, and others of concern. <br />I am sending this email to vocalize my concern and disappointment with the process and the outcome of <br />this Stormwater Ordinance update, City File: CA 24-3. I have tried to inform City staff, the Planning <br />Commission, the City Attorney about the drastic changes that are proposed in this update. If the <br />Stormwater Ordinance amendments are adopted as currently proposed the ramifications to our currently <br />approved needed housing projects will be devastating. While I appreciate staff’s changes responding to our <br />concerns, those changes have improved the proposed amendment only slightly. But thus far the changes to <br />the proposed amendment have absolutely fallen short. <br />I want to be 100% clear that the City of Eugene is planning on changing course and not upholding their <br />current practices and policies. We have always been in agreement with the City that our planning <br />documents and approvals are legally binding documents between both parties. This action by the City is <br />now showing the development community that those planning decisions are no longer a binding <br />agreement with the city. Your own project approvals over the years have always proven that the City agrees <br />that these planning approvals are to be honored by the City at time of development. The building <br />community relies on the approved plans, and as currently proposed these code amendments would subject <br />infill development based on previously approved plans to be redesigned – at great cost and delay. <br />The following projects are examples of where the City agreed and approved structures based on the <br />original planning approvals even after adoption of new stormwater regulations were adopted by the City. <br />These lots were approved and developed fully based on their planning approvals: <br />2902, 2912, 2922, 2932, 2942, 2952, 2962, 2972, 2982, 2992, 3016, 3026, 3036, 3046, 3056, 3066, 3076, <br />3086 Lord Byron Place <br />3343 Wyndham Court, 3370 Wyndham Court, 3387 Amherst Way, 3382 Amherst Way <br />1346 Brickley, 1352 Brickley <br />515 Silver Meadows, 527 Silver Meadows, 541 Silver Meadows <br />CA 24-3 Testimony Batch 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.