My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Testimony – Open Record Applicant’s Representative Testimony - July 31, 2024
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2024
>
PDT 24-1
>
Public Testimony – Open Record Applicant’s Representative Testimony - July 31, 2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2024 3:10:06 PM
Creation date
8/1/2024 4:58:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
24
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
BRAEWOOD HILLS 3RD ADDITION
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
7/31/2024
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eugene Hearing Official <br />July 31, 2024 <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />explains that EWEB requires a looped water distribution system if there are more than 30 <br />services on a dead end line, which would occur if Middle Housing builds out fully in this project. <br />The amended site plan submitted with this memo proposed two easements intended for looping <br />the water lines if that is needed to serve future Middle Housing development. <br /> <br />(b) Sewer: (discussed at Staff Report page 18): The relevant standard is in EC <br />9.6505(2): <br /> <br />“(2) Sewage. All developments shall be served by the wastewater sewage <br />system of the city, complying with provisions in Chapter 6 of this code.” <br /> <br />The Staff Report at pages 18-19 summarizes this standard and confirms that the plans show the <br />8” sanitary line in Randy Lane will be extended through the project; proposed Condition 12 <br />requires an updated site plan showing service to proposed Lot 38. As is typical for Staff Reports <br />addressing the details of the sanitary system, it finds that the proposal can comply with city <br />specifications (“[T]he applicant’s proposed wastewater system conceptually complies with <br />applicable sewage specifications, subject to a more detailed review during the subsequent PEPI <br />permit process and building permit process.”) and requires detailed review in the PEPI process. <br />That evidence demonstrates compliance with the current standards stated in the code. <br /> <br />Furthermore, the KPFF memo submitted here documents that the proposed 8” sanitary line can <br />handle any amount of Middle Housing development. <br /> <br />(c) Stormwater: (discussed at Staff Report pages 21-22); EC 9.6790-9.6797. <br /> <br />These code provisions refer to the Stormwater Management Manual, which itself is an <br />acknowledged land use regulation. The Staff Reports finds, based on the applicant’s engineering <br />report and the Public Works comments, that the standards can be complied with proposed <br />conditions and future permitting requirements. That should resolve the matter. <br /> <br />In addition, the KPFF memo includes further analysis premised on full Middle Housing buildout, <br />which would increase the impervious surface on the site. About 4 times more detention volume <br />would be required. KPFF concludes: “To detain this higher volume, more pipes would <br />be added to the detention system. This approach is modular and easily scalable.” <br /> <br />There was testimony suggesting collecting the increment of storm runoff from the lots and <br />treating it for quality centrally, rather than doing it on the lots, as required by the City. As <br />explained in the KPFF memo, this can be accomplished if that is determined to be desirable by
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.