Eugene Hearing Official <br />July 31, 2024 <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />explains that EWEB requires a looped water distribution system if there are more than 30 <br />services on a dead end line, which would occur if Middle Housing builds out fully in this project. <br />The amended site plan submitted with this memo proposed two easements intended for looping <br />the water lines if that is needed to serve future Middle Housing development. <br /> <br />(b) Sewer: (discussed at Staff Report page 18): The relevant standard is in EC <br />9.6505(2): <br /> <br />“(2) Sewage. All developments shall be served by the wastewater sewage <br />system of the city, complying with provisions in Chapter 6 of this code.” <br /> <br />The Staff Report at pages 18-19 summarizes this standard and confirms that the plans show the <br />8” sanitary line in Randy Lane will be extended through the project; proposed Condition 12 <br />requires an updated site plan showing service to proposed Lot 38. As is typical for Staff Reports <br />addressing the details of the sanitary system, it finds that the proposal can comply with city <br />specifications (“[T]he applicant’s proposed wastewater system conceptually complies with <br />applicable sewage specifications, subject to a more detailed review during the subsequent PEPI <br />permit process and building permit process.”) and requires detailed review in the PEPI process. <br />That evidence demonstrates compliance with the current standards stated in the code. <br /> <br />Furthermore, the KPFF memo submitted here documents that the proposed 8” sanitary line can <br />handle any amount of Middle Housing development. <br /> <br />(c) Stormwater: (discussed at Staff Report pages 21-22); EC 9.6790-9.6797. <br /> <br />These code provisions refer to the Stormwater Management Manual, which itself is an <br />acknowledged land use regulation. The Staff Reports finds, based on the applicant’s engineering <br />report and the Public Works comments, that the standards can be complied with proposed <br />conditions and future permitting requirements. That should resolve the matter. <br /> <br />In addition, the KPFF memo includes further analysis premised on full Middle Housing buildout, <br />which would increase the impervious surface on the site. About 4 times more detention volume <br />would be required. KPFF concludes: “To detain this higher volume, more pipes would <br />be added to the detention system. This approach is modular and easily scalable.” <br /> <br />There was testimony suggesting collecting the increment of storm runoff from the lots and <br />treating it for quality centrally, rather than doing it on the lots, as required by the City. As <br />explained in the KPFF memo, this can be accomplished if that is determined to be desirable by