My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Testimony – Open Record Applicant’s Representative Testimony - July 31, 2024
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2024
>
PDT 24-1
>
Public Testimony – Open Record Applicant’s Representative Testimony - July 31, 2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2024 3:10:06 PM
Creation date
8/1/2024 4:58:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
24
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
BRAEWOOD HILLS 3RD ADDITION
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
7/31/2024
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eugene Hearing Official <br />July 31, 2024 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />“The street profile shown in red more accurately reflects the street slopes that <br />would result from an access on the north edge of the site. Accounting for the <br />vertical transitions at the top and bottom of the slope, the resulting street grade <br />would be 21%.” <br /> <br />The conclusion of the applicant and the staff that a connectivity standard is justified based on the <br />slope of the topography has a sound evidentiary basis. <br /> <br />3. City Utility and Stormwater Standards: The proposal meets city utility standards for <br />the proposed development and Middle Housing. Furthermore, full Middle Housing <br />development can, as a practical matter, be served consistent with city standards for public <br />improvements. <br /> <br />This application meets the current code standards that apply to this proposed use. Furthermore, <br />because the Middle Housing Statute allows up to four units on each lot, it is prudent for the <br />applicant to show that code standards relating to facilities can meet by the proposal. <br /> <br />(a) Water Supply: (discussed at Staff Report page 18). <br /> <br />The “water supply” standard is the first among the “public improvements – specifications” <br />standards stated at EC 9.6505. The introductory language and “water supply” requirement is <br />stated at 9.650t(1): <br /> <br />“All public improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance <br />with adopted plans and policies, the procedures specified in Chapter 7 of this <br />code, and standards and specifications adopted pursuant to Chapter 7 of this <br />code. Additionally, all developments shall make and be served by the <br />following infrastructure improvements. <br /> <br />(a) Water Supply. All developments shall be served by the water <br />system of the Eugene Water & Electric Board.” <br /> <br />The Staff Report references the EWEB comments at Staff Report page 86 explaining that there is <br />an 8” main in Randy Lane to serve the subdivision. The current code standard requires proof of <br />service. EWEB has confirmed that service is available. That should suffice to support a finding <br />of compliance. <br /> <br />Nevertheless, because state law will allow Middle Housing, it is prudent to show that water <br />distribution can be done consistent with EWEB standards. The KPFF memo submitted here
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.