My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Application Deemed Incomplete 2024-04-25
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2024
>
PDT 24-1
>
Application Deemed Incomplete 2024-04-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2024 5:01:05 PM
Creation date
5/28/2024 4:55:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
24
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
BRAEWOOD HILLS 3RD ADDITION
Document Type
Application Complete Letter
Document_Date
5/28/2024
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tentative Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 36. Indicates means of irrigation. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 37. Open space and landscaping proposed for open space areas shown. <br />Comments <br /> <br />Tree Preservation Requirements <br />Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ <br />38. Provided a tree preservation plan prepared by a certified arborist or <br />approved equivalent. Included both a narrative description and a <br />corresponding site plan to address tree preservation criterion. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 39. Healthy trees that have a reasonable chance of survival considering the <br />base zone or special area zone and other applicable approval criteria. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 40. Trees located within vegetated corridors and stands rather than <br />individual isolated trees subject to windthrow. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 41. Trees that fulfill a screening function, provide relief from glare, or shade <br />expansive areas of pavement. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 42. Trees that provide a buffer between potentially incompatible land uses. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 43. Trees located along the perimeter of the lot(s) and within building <br />setback areas. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 44. Trees and stands of trees located along ridgelines and within view <br />corridors. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 45. Trees with significant habitat value. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 46. Trees adjacent to public parks, open space and streets. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 47. Trees along water features <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 48. Heritage trees. <br />Comments <br /> <br />Natural Features Assessment and Delineation of Applicable Boundaries on Site Plan <br />Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ <br />49. Significant on-site vegetation, including rare plants (those that are <br />proposed for listing or are listed under State or Federal law), and native <br />plant communities shown. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 50. All documented habitat for all rare animal species (those that are <br />proposed for listing or are listed under State or Federal law) are shown. <br />☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ 51. Prominent topographic features, such as ridgelines and outcrops shown. <br />☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ 52. Wetlands, intermittent and perennial stream corridors, and riparian <br />areas shown. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ <br />53. Natural resource areas designated in the Metro Plan diagram as <br />"Natural Resource" and areas identified in any city-adopted natural <br />resource inventory shown. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 54. If disturbance to natural features, a mitigation plan was submitted, in <br />accordance with 9.8520(4)(c). <br />Comments <br /> <br />Architectural Features of Proposed Buildings <br />Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 55. Indicated general building locations, bulk and height. <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 56. Indicated key architectural features of proposed buildings (concept <br />drawings okay). <br />☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 57. Indicated how buildings proposed on slopes will blend with natural <br />terrain if subject to the South Hills Study. <br />Comments <br /> <br />Supporting Documents <br />Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.