My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
24_03_04_1700_Batch5_Testimony
>
OnTrack
>
MA
>
2023
>
MA 23-5
>
24_03_04_1700_Batch5_Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2024 4:02:21 PM
Creation date
3/6/2024 12:30:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
MA
File Year
23
File Sequence Number
5
Application Name
River Road-Santa Clara Neighborhood Plan
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
3/4/2024
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACTION <br />RENT-ALL&EVENTS <br />KEVIN & LORA JOURNEY <br />OWNERS <br />OFFICE: 541-726-6517 <br />FAX: 541-726-9665 121 RIVER AVE <br />ACTIONRENTALLEVENTS Q@GMAIL.COM EUGENE, OR 97404 <br />This letter is being written on behalf of the locally owned small business of Action Rent -All and its 18 <br />employees. <br />We appreciate and want to thank all the people who put in all the hard work in preparing the RRSC Plan <br />and the people who have to make the decision of approving, altering or postponing this plan. As the <br />Planning commissioners you have to ask yourself are we going to support this plan in any way only <br />because of the hard work put in or are we going to make our decision based on what will be best for <br />RRSC and the small businesses? <br />If it's because of the hard work put in, then you will be ignoring: <br />1. The advice of multiple land use attorneys, land planning and consulting experts who know the <br />laws and have real life experience in how and what works. <br />2. The fact that you will be crippling or deleting small business owners. <br />3. The Opportunity for new future small business owners. <br />4. The fact that c-2 property owners were not notified properly for there impute. <br />5. That River Ave is mostly made up of c-2 properties with some buildings that sit hundreds of feet <br />off the street and a sewer treatment plant. We are not part of the corridor plan that the RRSC <br />pian was meant to address. We are a convenient business street meant to support our local <br />customers who have the right to expand, grow and give back to the neighborhood who built <br />their businesses. <br />6. The fact that our businesses or land will be worth substantially less with these changes and or <br />possibly not be able to sell. <br />7. That the city has said they did not target any businesses but then says "We want to go away <br />from automotive uses" <br />8. The concern that many commissioners have voiced about hurting small businesses. <br />9. The fact that this is what a very small percentage of residence want and do not understand the <br />impact of this and not what c-2 owners want. This is based on my informal poling of our <br />hundreds of customers and businesses that we talked to who knew nothing or very little about <br />it. <br />10. That 1 of the Community Organization Board Members has raised concerns about if the plan is <br />ready or should be implemented. <br />If you truly want to help small business, then have a plan that helps them not one that is a slow <br />death sentence by making it impractical or a non conforming business that cannot expand and <br />grow with the community. <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.