(3) The city has performed or reviewed traffic engineering analyses that indicate approval of the development will result <br />in levels of service of the roadway system in the vicinity of the development that do not meet adopted level of service <br />standards. <br />Response: To the applicants' knowledge the city has not performed or reviewed traffic engineering analyses that indicate approval <br />of the proposed tentative subdivision plan will contribute to traffic problems in the area, or result in levels of service on the roadway <br />system in the vicinity of the subject property that exceed adopted mobility standards. <br />(4) For development sites that abut a street in the jurisdiction of Lane County, a Traffic Impact Analysis Review is <br />required if the proposed development will generate or receive traffic by vehicles of heavy weight in their daily operations. <br />For purposes of EC 9.8650 through EC 9.8680, "daily operations" does not include routine services provided to the site by <br />others, such as mail delivery, garbage pickup, or bus service. "Daily operations" does include, but is not limited to, <br />delivery (to or from the site) of materials or products processed or sold by the business occupying the site. For purposes <br />of EC 9.8650 through EC 9.8680, "heavy vehicles" are defined as a single vehicle or vehicle combination greater than <br />26,000 pounds gross vehicle weight or combined gross vehicle weight respectively. <br />Response: The proposed Riverstone Park Subdivision will not generate or receive traffic by vehicles of heavy weight in their daily <br />operations. <br />(12) For applications intended to implement an approved tentative or final planned unit development for the site: <br />(a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the approved planned unit development plan; <br />(b) If full compliance with a tentative subdivision criterion in this section would cause an inconsistency between <br />the tentative subdivision plan and an approved tentative or final planned unit development for the site, the city <br />shall require compliance with that subdivision criterion only to the extent that it can do so without creating the <br />inconsistency. <br />Response: This proposed tentative subdivision plan is not intended to implement a tentative or final planned unit development <br />(PUD) for the subject property. This criterion is not applicable. <br />(13) If the applicant elects to use the expedited land division procedures in EC 9.7900 through EC 9.7925, the application <br />must meet the following additional approval criteria: <br />Response: The applicant does not elect to use the expedited land division procedures, but rather the general and discretionary <br />procedure. This criterion is not applicable. <br />17 <br />