WRITTEN STATEMENT FOR EASEMENT VACATION SSW Job No. 23-8098 PAGE 5 of 5 <br />(2) Such public services, facilities, or utilities can be extended in an orderly and efficient <br />manner in an alternate location. <br /> <br />As discussed above, such public services, facilities, or utilities can be extended in an orderly <br />and efficient manner in an alternate location. More specifically, any such future public services, <br />facilities, or utilities will either be contained within the Burnett Avenue public right-of-way, or <br />within the resultant contiguous 7 foot wide PUE consisting of the proposed new portion of 7 foot <br />wide PUE in combination with the 7 foot wide portion of existing easement proposed to remain. <br />The proposed vacation therefore complies with this criterion. <br /> <br />(3) The vacation does not impede the future best use of the remainder of the property <br />under the same ownership or any adjoining land; or adversely affect the development <br />of the remainder land, or any adjoining land, or access thereto; and the vacation does <br />not conflict with provisions of this code including the street connectivity standards <br />and block lengths. <br /> <br />In consideration of the preceding findings, the proposed easement vacation does not impede <br />the future best use of the subject or adjoining properties, or adversely affect the development <br />(or redevelopment) of the remainder land or any adjoining land. In fact, the proposed easement <br />vacation will actually serve to facilitate the future best use and development of the subject <br />properties by increasing the buildable areas within. This request does not involve the vacation <br />of street right-of-ways, and therefore does not adversely affect access to the subject or <br />adjoining properties, or conflict with the provisions of the Eugene Code regarding street <br />connectivity standards and block lengths. The proposed vacation therefore complies with this <br />criterion. <br /> <br />(4) Payment of the special benefit assessment(s) resulting from the vacation of <br />unimproved right-of-way required by EC 9.8710(5)(a), have been made to the city. <br /> <br />This request is not for the vacation of unimproved public right-of-way therefore this criterion is <br />not applicable. <br /> <br /> <br />ADDITIONAL INFORMATION <br /> <br />The subject parcels were created through a previous land use application, more specifically <br />approved Tentative Partition PT 21-18 and associated Final Partition Plat PF 22-09. A copy of <br />the Findings & Decision document for PT 21-18 is attached hereto for reference. The proposed <br />vacation does not conflict with the sole condition of approval or other requirements associated <br />with said tentative partition approval. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />PREPARED BY: <br /> <br />SSW Engineers Inc. <br /> <br />Jason Goshert, Project Manager <br />Survey & Land Use Planning Technician