Draft | December 1, 2023 63 <br /> <br />Policy Action Feasibility Timeframe Cost <br />Implemented <br />By <br />A: Code <br />Amendment <br />B: Program/Project <br />C: Community <br />Partnership <br />Related to <br />Existing <br />Plan/Project <br />services if <br />amalgamation and/or <br />transition of service <br />providers is <br />considered. <br />17.2.2 Make this planning process <br />transparent by involving the <br />community in the formulation of these <br />plans. <br />Moderate Short $$$ City <br />County <br />Community <br />Service <br />Providers <br />C <br />17.2.3 Review essential service levels <br />as they currently exist and ascertain <br />what public services are missing or <br />deficient; and create a path to <br />mitigating these deficiencies <br />(example: no service by Cahoots for <br />unincorporated residents). <br />Difficult Medium $$$$ City <br />County <br />Service <br />Providers <br />B <br />17.2.4 If service providers are <br />amalgamated and/or transitioned, <br />adjust current boundaries of service <br />districts to assure that residents, <br />especially those who are currently <br />outside the UGB, continue to be <br />served. <br />Difficult Medium $$$$ Service <br />Providers <br />B <br />17.2.5 Prioritize provision of <br />comprehensive public safety services <br />and develop strategies for equitable <br />administration of those services <br />throughout River Road and Santa Clara <br />neighborhoods. <br />Moderate Long $$$ EPD <br />Lane County <br />Sheriff <br />B, C