with public engagement and leading to co -adoption by our local elected leaders. Although <br />communication is expected to be open, there are certain expectations to address. The solid lines, above <br />in Figure 2., indicate that direct communication will occur in the form of general input, idea generation, <br />or review of draft products. The solid lines also suggest a more direct line of communication. For <br />comparison, the dotted lines depict entities that are acting in an advisory role, addressing either <br />technical or policy -based areas of expertise. The lines of communication here are also expected to be <br />more indirect. For example, Working Group members will communicate with the Project Management <br />Team directly if questions arise about technical issues. Then, the PMT can coordinate with the <br />appropriate staff member on the Technical Advisory Committee to resolve the issue. In this way, <br />communication is simplified by creating a single point of contact — the Project Management Team — for <br />both the working group members and the Technical Advisory Committee. <br />General Public & Key Stakeholders <br />■ Members of the general public and key stakeholder groups that wish to engage occasionally, <br />e.g., by taking online surveys, reading newsletters, participating in interviews or attending small <br />group meetings, and/or attending larger public events. <br />■ Generate ideas, offer solutions or projects to address concerns. <br />■ Provide feedback and critique of proposed vision, solutions (e.g., policies, code amendments), <br />and capital project proposals (e.g., lighting along the West Bank Path, new sidewalks near River <br />Road Elementary) that will inform the final recommendation by the future CAC. <br />Interested Parties List (i.e., Community Resource Group) <br />■ Members of the general public, RRCO and SCCO Boards, and SCRRIPT that are willing to take <br />greater ownership of the work products and make time to get more deeply involved. <br />■ Anticipate some of these individuals will volunteer for the Working Groups in order to provide <br />more in-depth feedback to the Project Management Team. <br />■ Overall input will inform the final recommendation by the future CAC. <br />Working Groups <br />■ 5 small Working Groups will be created; each will tackle 1 of the Plan's 5 priority areas. <br />■ Comprised of members of the general public, RRCO and SCCO Boards, current SCRRIPT group, or <br />the CAC that are willing, interested, and able to dive deeper into the specific work products. <br />■ These teams will support the CAC and goalkeepers in working with the Project Management <br />Team and the Technical Advisory Committee members in the development of the 4 major <br />deliverables. <br />■ When necessary, staff will bring in other individuals to supplement the conversation and <br />analysis, as well as ensuring diverse perspectives are represented in the review. <br />■ All meetings are considered public, will be advertised as such, and summary minutes provided <br />online to ensure open communication. <br />■ ESTIMATED TIME COMMITMENT: Meetings will be held at no greater than 2 month intervals; <br />Members are expected to review materials via email or web based sharing platforms on a more <br />frequent basis. <br />101 Page <br />50 <br />