18 <br /> <br />f. Systems development charge adjustments related to neighborhood schools; and <br />g. The possibility of adjusting boundaries, when practical and when total enrollment will not be affected, <br />where a single, otherwise internally cohesive area is divided into more than one school district. <br />The Urban Facilities Plan contains Policy 3.7(2), “School districts are encouraged to examine district <br />boundaries in light of servicing economies, especially bussing, and their effect on maintaining a cohesive <br />community identity” and Policy 3.7(3), “Encourage the continued multiple use of school facilities.” <br />Though the Urban Facilities Plan is proposed to be repealed, this school-related policy direction <br />continues to be represented in the Metro Plan. <br />Chapter III I. Historic Preservation Element <br />I.1 Adopt and implement historic preservation policies, regulations, and incentive programs that <br />encourage the inventory, preservation, and restoration of structures; landmarks; sites; and areas of <br />cultural, historic, or archaeological significance, consistent with overall policies. <br />The Urban Facilities Plan contains Policy 4.6(1), “Inventory structures, landmarks, sites, and areas of <br />cultural, historic, or archaeological significance,” and Policy 4.6(2), “Encourage the preservation and <br />restoration of structures, landmarks, sites, and areas of cultural, historic, or archaeological significance.” <br />Though the Urban Facilities Plan is proposed to be repealed, the policy direction related to historic <br />structures continues to be captured in the Metro Plan. <br /> <br />City of Eugene Criteria <br />EC 9.7735 Metro Plan Amendments – Criteria for Approval. <br />(3) When the city-specific local comprehensive plan also applies, the proposed amendment is <br />consistent with the city-specific local comprehensive plan. <br />The City Council finds that the Metro Plan amendments are consistent with the Eugene-specific local <br />comprehensive plan, the Envision Eugene Comprehensive Plan (Envision Eugene). The currently adopted <br />chapters of the Envision Eugene Comprehensive Plan include Economic Development, Transportation, <br />Administration & Implementation, and Eugene Urban Growth Boundary. The Neighborhood Plan’s <br />economic development policies are consistent with those in Envision Eugene, such as the promotion of <br />locally-owned businesses, capitalizing on Eugene’s economic advantages, and employment growth. As <br />discussed in Statewide Planning Goals 11 and 12 above, the Eugene 2035 Transportation System Plan <br />(TSP) is the transportation element of Eugene’s comprehensive land use plan. The Neighborhood Plan is <br />consistent with and aligns with policies in the TSP, especially those related to walkable neighborhoods <br />and compact development. For example, one of the TSP system-wide policies is to “Foster <br />neighborhoods where Eugene residents could meet most of their basic daily needs without an <br />automobile by providing streets, sidewalks, bikeways, and access to transit in an inviting environment <br />where all travelers feel safe and secure” and one of the transit policies aims to “Prioritize improved <br />transit service in Key Corridors and other areas with sufficient employment, activities, or residential <br />density that best support transit service and transit services that connect residents to employment <br />centers. If operational funding is sufficient, extend transit to support higher density housing and <br />employment development planned for other areas.” The Neighborhood Plan does not affect the