My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
23_10_06_1143 Background Record Materials
>
OnTrack
>
MA
>
2023
>
MA 23-5
>
23_10_06_1143 Background Record Materials
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 3:22:17 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 3:20:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
MA
File Year
23
File Sequence Number
5
Application Name
River Road-Santa Clara Neighborhood Plan
Document Type
Staff Report
Document_Date
10/6/2023
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A (High) Priority <br />B (Medium) Priority <br />C (Lesser) Priority <br />Not prioritized <br />Actions that involve County implementation. Actions with feasibility concerns identified by staff Draft April 2021 – Page 19 <br />Action Feasibility Timeframe Cost <br />A: Code <br />Amendment <br />B: Program <br />/Project <br />C: Community <br />Partnership <br />Implemented <br />by: <br />Notes <br />(current consideration, potential next steps to implement, <br />policy considerations, etc.) <br />12.4.1 Utilize Opportunity Siting and other incentives <br />to collaborate to develop innovative projects that are <br />supported by a developer and the Neighborhood <br />Association and approved by governing agency. <br />Difficult Long $$ <br />A - Group 3, B, <br />C <br />City, <br />Community, <br />Developers <br />Opportunity Siting is not adopted in code and incentives <br />would require new funding. Recommend focusing more on <br />collaboration between City, community and developers. <br />The Housing Tools and Strategies project discussed this as a <br />potential solution, but it didn’t rise to the top. CAC <br />recommends piloting this at the Santa Clara Transit Stop and <br />propose funding Opportunity Siting development to the <br />Eugene City Council. Adopting Opportunity Siting as code is <br />recommended for Group 3 as it should be a citywide code <br />amendment and would need a broader public process. This <br />action would need to be initiated by Council and prioritized to <br />receive needed funding and staff resources to implement. <br />14.1.2 Increase minimum required parking standards <br />when higher density development abuts R-1 zoning <br />and the adjacent streets (i.e. lanes) aren’t developed <br />to Eugene’s local street standard or higher to avoid <br />spillover parking problems. <br />Difficult Medium $$ A - Group 3 City <br />This would not be consistent with Eugene’s Transportation <br />System Plan, Climate Action Plan and Climate Recovery <br />Ordinance, HB 2001 or in-progress state rulemaking for <br />Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities, which <br />specifically will address limiting off-street parking <br />requirements. Could explore possible solutions to consider in <br />Special Area Zone. May be better addressed by focusing on <br />transportation improvements rather than code. <br />Transportation topic area focuses on improving active <br />transportation and transit to reduce need for parking. <br />May 12, 2021, Work Session - Item 1CC Agenda - Page 30
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.