<br />A (High) Priority <br />B (Medium) Priority <br />C (Lesser) Priority <br />Not prioritized <br />Actions that involve County implementation. Actions with feasibility concerns identified by staff Draft April 2021 – Page 15 <br /> <br />Action Feasibility <br />Timeframe Cost <br />A: Code <br />Amendment <br />B: Program <br />/Project <br />C: Community <br />Partnership <br />Implemente <br />d by: <br />Notes <br />(current consideration, potential next steps to <br />implement, policy considerations, etc.) <br />7.1.2 Identify, protect and enhance waterways that are <br />not currently protected <br />• Public Easements - Identify location of easements and <br />which easements are protected by goal 5 or goal 6 <br />(WQ) <br />• Pursue County adoption of Goal 5 and Goal 6 (WQ) <br />protections for parcels inside neighborhood boundaries <br />Moderate <br />-Difficult <br />Medium- <br />Ongoing $$ <br />A - Group 2- <br />County Illicit <br />Discharge <br />Code Changes, <br />Group 3- <br />County <br />adoption of <br />Goal 6, <br />B <br />City, County, <br />Community <br />Easements aren’t currently mapped/identified. This action <br />is related to several City and County projects, such as the <br />Stormwater Basin Master Plan update and upcoming <br />County illicit discharge code amendments. The <br />Stormwater Basin Master Plan, including the River Road - <br />Santa Clara basin, will be updated to refine stormwater <br />management strategies and continue to deliver flood <br />protection, clean water and healthy habitat. <br />Group 2- Lane County will be doing illicit discharge code <br />amendments that must be adopted by February 2022, <br />which may support the intent of this action by protecting <br />and enhancing stormwater conveyances. <br />Group 3- Lane County has adopted Goal 5 Water <br />Resources Conservation Overlay protections for land <br />inside the UGB that is outside the city limits. Goal 6 Water <br />Quality Overlay was not adopted outside of the city limits <br />but is applied upon annexation. This would need to be <br />initiated and prioritized by decision-makers to receive <br />funding and staff resources to implement. <br />14.1.1 Develop transitions between R-1 properties. Difficult Short $$ A - Group 2- <br />HB 2001 City <br />Eugene’s middle housing project to consider approach for <br />R-1 standards as part of implementation of HB 2001. <br />Design standards must be the same or less restrictive than <br />those in DLCD’s model code. Discuss with Planning <br />Commission. Could be challenging with HB2001. <br />May 12, 2021, Work Session - Item 1CC Agenda - Page 26