My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Supplemental Materials 5.24.22
>
OnTrack
>
ST
>
2022
>
ST 22-1
>
Supplemental Materials 5.24.22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/25/2022 3:11:32 PM
Creation date
5/25/2022 3:11:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
ST
File Year
22
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
BUSTER PLACE
Document Type
Supplemental Materials
Document_Date
5/24/2022
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Page 2 of 9 <br />THE FAVREAU GROUP <br />CIVIL ENGINEERING <br />RESPONSE: The application includes all contiguous undeveloped or partially developed property under the <br />same ownership and the owner, Michael Sorric has signed the application and does not own any <br />other contiguous property. <br /> (3) The tentative subdivision plan application shall include a phasing plan that indicates any <br />proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. <br />Phasing shall progress in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the various phases <br />of the development and accommodates other required public improvements. <br />RESPONSE: The subdivision will be carried out in one phase. <br /> (4) The lot proposed to be divided in the subdivision application is a lot. <br />RESPONSE: Tax Lot 17-04-14-42-06500 was established in deed (1961-31995) dated May 12, 1961 and <br />submitted with this application. <br /> (5) If the proposal includes needed housing, as defined by State statutes, the written statement <br />submitted with the subdivision application shall clearly state whether the applicant is electing to use <br />the general approval criteria in EC 9.8515 Subdivision, Tentative Plan Approval Criteria- General <br />instead of the approval criteria found in EC 9.8520 Subdivision, Tentative Plan Approval Criteria- <br />Needed Housing. <br />RESPONSE: The applicant is electing to use the needed housing criteria. Due to the lack of housing in Eugene, <br />all new housing is considered needed housing. <br /> <br />APPROVAL CRITERIA – NEEDED HOUSING <br />9.85209.85209.85209.8520 Subdivision, TeSubdivision, TeSubdivision, TeSubdivision, Tentative Plan Approval Criteria ntative Plan Approval Criteria ntative Plan Approval Criteria ntative Plan Approval Criteria –––– Needed HousingNeeded HousingNeeded HousingNeeded Housing. . . . The planning director shall <br />approve, conditionally approve, or deny the subdivision application. Unless the applicant elects to <br />use the general criteria contained in EC 9.8515 Subdivision, Tentative Plan Approval Criteria – <br />General, where the applicant proposes needed housing, as defined by the State statutes, the <br />planning director shall approve or approve with conditions a subdivision based on compliance with <br />the following criteria: <br /> (1) The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed housing is needed housing as defined by <br />State statutes. <br />RESPONSE: The site qualifies for needed housing, due to its location and existing slopes of less than 20%. <br /> (2) The proposed land uses and densities are consistent with the land use designation(s) shown on <br />the Metro Plan Land Use Diagram, as refined in any applicable refinement plan. <br />RESPONSE: The Metro Plan and the River Road – Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan are the applicable adopted <br />plans with policies beginning at EC 9.9500. The proposal complies with the site’s low density <br />residential designation on the Metro Plan Diagram and the River Road – Santa Clara Urban <br />Facilties Plan Land Use Diagram. <br /> (3) The proposed subdivision complies with all of the following, unless specifically exempt from <br />compliance through a code provision applicable to a special area zone or overlay zone: <br />(a) EC 9.2000 through 9.3915 regarding lot dimensions and density requirements for the <br />subject zone. Within the /WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay Zone or /WQ <br />Water Quality Overlay Zone, no new lot may be created if more than 33% of the lot, <br />as created, would be occupied by either: <br /> 1. The combined area of the /WR conservation setback and any portion of the Goal 5 <br />Water Resource Site that extends landward beyond the conservation setback; or <br /> 2. The /WQ Management Area <br />RESPONSE: The proposed subdivision meets or exceeds the minimum lot dimensions and areas as defined in <br />the Eugene Code. Per EC 9.0500, the lot width is defined as the horizontal distance between the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.