My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet
>
OnTrack
>
Z
>
2022
>
Z 22-2
>
Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2022 4:02:27 PM
Creation date
4/6/2022 1:29:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
Z
File Year
22
File Sequence Number
2
Application Name
CLAIRE SENDERLING
Document Type
Staff Report
Document_Date
4/13/2022
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regarding (2) above, and in consideration of the findings included in this staff report, the <br />requested zone change appears to meet the approval criteria at EC 9.8865, as evidenced by <br />staff's recommendation for approval. <br />Regarding (3) above, the Q Street Channel is a Category D Goal 5 water resource identified for <br />conservation, which includes a 20-foot conservation area setback, as discussed in the <br />application details of this staff report and in the applicant's narrative. A digitized representation <br />of the Q Street Channel resource boundary is shown in Attachment A. However, the Goal 5 <br />water resource and its applicable conservation area only impacts the norther tax lot (2200). The <br />southern tax lot (2103) does not include land with a Goal 5 water resource or water resource <br />conservation area. <br />Based on these findings, the siting requirements for the /WR overlay zone are met for Tax Lot <br />2200, but are not met for Tax Lot 2103. Therefore, staff recommends that Tax Lot 2200 include <br />the /WR overlay zone, whereas Tax Lot 2103 should not include the /WR overlay zone. <br />EC 9.8865(5): In cases where the NR zone is applied based on EC 9.2510(1)(b), the <br />property owner shall enter into a contractual arrangement with the city to ensure the <br />area is maintained as a natural resource area for a minimum of 50 years. <br />The applicant is not requesting the NR zone and the subject site is not located in an area that <br />would otherwise require the application of the NR zone. Based on the available information and <br />evidence, this criterion is not applicable. <br />Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) <br />Goal 12 Transportation of the Statewide Planning Goals, adopted by the Land Conservation and <br />Development Commission (LCDC), must be specifically addressed as part of the requested zone <br />change and in the context of Oregon Administrative Rules, as follows. <br />As adopted, OAR 660-012-0060(1) states: <br />(1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, <br />or a land use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an <br />existing or planned transportation facility, then the local government must put <br />in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment <br />is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule. <br />The proposal qualifies for an exception under subsection (9), because the applicant is <br />requesting zoning that is consistent with the Metro Plan designation. <br />Staff Report <br />Cornerstone Community Housing I Z 22-1 <br />Page 26 of 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.