Response: Responses to the applicable standards are provided previously in Sections 9.6791 through <br />9.6797 of this narrative. As discussed previously, the flow control standards for <br />headwaters do not apply because the application does not involve stormwater <br />conveyance into a waterway from above 500 feet in elevation. Planned stormwater <br />management facilities are shown on the Preliminary Composite Utility Plan in Exhibit A. <br />This criterion is met. <br />(i) The proposed subdivision complies with other applicable <br />development standards for features explicitly included in the <br />application. <br />An approved adjustment to a standard pursuant to the provisions <br />beginning at EC 9.8015 of this land use code constitutes compliance <br />with the standard. <br />Response: Adjustments to the applicable standards are not needed or included in this application. <br />The project feature that diverges from the objective standards in the code were reviewed <br />under and approved using the flexibility of the PUD approval process. This criterion is met. <br />(11) The proposal complies with the Traffic Impact Analysis Review provisions of <br />EC 9.8650 through 9.8680 where applicable. <br />Response: The potential traffic impacts of this project were reviewed and approved under the <br />original East Ridge Village PUD approval (PDF 02-2) and addressed with the conditions of <br />approval that were satisfied under previous phases. The project reduces the density that <br />was previously evaluated. Therefore, further traffic analysis is not warranted. <br />(12) For applications intended to implement an approved tentative or final <br />planned unit development for the site: <br />(a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the approved planned <br />unit development plan; <br />(b) If full compliance with a tentative subdivision criterion in this section <br />would cause an inconsistency between the tentative subdivision plan <br />and an approved tentative or final planned unit development for the <br />site, the city shall require compliance with that subdivision criterion <br />only to the extent that it can do so without creating the inconsistency. <br />Response: This application includes a modification to PDF 02-2. With the included modification, <br />compliance with the subdivision criteria will not create any inconsistency between the <br />subdivision plan and the approved PUD. This criterion is satisfied. <br />9.9590 Laurel Hill Plan Policies. <br />(1) Laurel Hill Valley Neighborhood Land Use and Future Urban Design <br />(Section 1, Subsection C). <br />(a) Approval of Valley Development will take into consideration: <br />1. Densitv. The appropriate density for residential <br />development shall be determined based on 1) the provision <br />of the Metropolitan Area General Plan calling for an overall <br />density range of one to ten units per acre; and 2) provisions <br />of the South Hills Study, including those limiting density to <br />five units per acre for sites above 500 feet in elevation. <br />2. Size. Large apartment complexes (over thirty-two units) are <br />objectionable because their dominance would alter entirely <br />,~/►L7 East Highlands Lot 46 - City of Eugene November 2021 <br />PUD Modification, Cluster Subdivision, Property Line Adjustment and Page 40 <br />Slope Easement Vacation <br />