Response: Conservation area Lot C is greater than 13,500 SF in size based on Section 9.2761(5)(b). <br />However, this lot corresponds to the conservation area approved at this location under <br />the PDF 02-2, as modified under this application. Therefore, the project will result in a <br />fully developed property consistent with the approved PUD. This criterion does not apply. <br />(9) As far as is practicable, lot side lines shall run at right angles to the street upon <br />which the lots face, except that on curved streets they shall be radial to the <br />curve. <br />Response: As shown on the Preliminary Plans in Exhibit A, the side lot lines created by the edge of <br />the proposed private street lot are curved to meet the curve of the adjacent Deerfern <br />Road public right-of-way. Nevertheless, the side lot lines for the rowhouse lots are <br />planned to run at right angles to the streets upon which they face, to the maximum extent <br />practical. This criterion is met. <br />(10) The proposed subdivision complies with all of the following: <br />(a) EC 9.6706 Development in Flood Plains through EC 9.6709 Special <br />Flood Hazard Areas - Standards. <br />Response: The project site is not within a FEMA-mapped flood plain or a special flood hazard area. <br />This criterion does not apply. <br />(b) EC 9.6710 Geological and Geotechnical Analysis. <br />Response: A Geotechnical Engineering Report is included in Exhibit E. The Applicant intends to <br />adhere to the recommendations in the report. This criterion is met. <br />(c) EC 9.6730 Pedestrian Circulation On-Site. <br />Response: Pedestrian circulation will be provided consistent with a sidewalk along the planned <br />private street as shown in the Preliminary Plans in Exhibit A. This criterion is met. <br />(d) EC 9.6735 Public Access Required. <br />Response: Public streets and common areas, shown on the Preliminary Dimensioned Subdivision <br />Plans in Exhibit A, provide the required access. This criterion is met. <br />(e) EC 9.6750 Special Setback Standards. <br />Response: Brackenfern Road is constructed to City standards. Deerfern Road is planned to be <br />constructed to City standards. Therefore, special setbacks are not anticipated to be <br />necessary. This criterion does not apply. <br />(f) EC 9.6775 Underground Utilities. <br />Response: Utilities will be placed underground, as shown on the Preliminary Composite Utility Plan <br />in Exhibit A. This criterion is met. <br />(g) EC 9.6780 Vision Clearance Area. <br />Response: Responses to the applicable vision clearance area standards are provided previously in <br />Section 9.6780 of this narrative. A planned vision clearance area detail is provided on <br />Sheet P11 in Exhibit A. This criterion is met. <br />(h) EC 9.6791 through 9.6797 regarding stormwater flood control, <br />quality, flow control for headwaters area, oil control, source control, <br />easements, and operation and maintenance. <br />East Highlands Lot 46 - City of Eugene November 2021 <br />PUD Modification, Cluster Subdivision, Property Line Adjustment and Page 39 <br />Slope Easement Vacation <br />