Completeness Review #2 - Incomplete

® ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Date, north arrow, and standard engineer's scale shown on the site plan. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Assessor's map and tax lot numbers shown on the site plan. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Vicinity map shown on the site plan. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. All adjacent streets, alleys, and accessways, including right-of-way and paving widths shown. 6. All dimensions of existing public utility easements and any other ® ❑ ❑ ❑ areas restricting use of the parcels, such as conservation areas, slope easements, access easements, etc. shown. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. Existing dimensions and square footage of the parcels involved shown. 8. Proposed dimensions and square footage of the parcels involved ® ❑ ❑ ❑ (applies to vacations of undeveloped plats and right-of-ways) shown. 9. For easement, right-of-way and public way vacations, the dimensions are clearly shown of entire easement or right-of- El ❑ ❑ ® way/public way on or adjacent to the subject parcel(s). Also, dimensions of that portion proposed for vacation, including square footage clearly shown. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 10. The location and property line setbacks of all existing structures, including those under pending building permits are shown. 7. Please show the area of all parcels on the "Existing Conditions" and "Proposed Conditions" site plans. It is noted that the area of Parcels 1 and 3 is included on the proposed conditions site plan, but only shows how much area will be gained. Please show the total new area as well. a. We still only have the amount of increased area. Please add the total parcel area before and after. Comments: 3. The assessor's number for Parcel 3 is incorrect on the affected tax lot map. Should be 18040412 100. aFe r4r=uiatieRs, F ideRtify them F.,F m fee s gbiF J Ieep aRd sler= u... drive General Requirements Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A 11. Submitted legal description for each easement or right-of-way to be vacated. In the case of plat vacations, a legal description is ❑ ❑ ® ❑ submitted for each affected parcel. Descriptions must be typed on an 8-1/2 x 11" white sheet of paper (no letterhead) so that it is suitable for recording. 12. If any parcel or lot was created through a previous land use ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ application, evidence that the proposed vacation will be consistent with the original conditions of approval is provided. 13. For public utility easement vacations, written statements of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ concurrence for the proposed vacation from affected utility providers is provided. 14. For any vacation request under the Type I or II process, signatures ❑ ❑ ❑ ® of all owners of the property subject to the easement and the owners of abutting properties are provided. 15. For vacations of right-of-way or public ways, consent of ❑ ® ❑ ❑ surrounding property owners is provided, as required by Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) section 271.080. 11. Please confirm whether this legal description is for the ROW associated with Songbird Loop and Slocum Drive. Does it also include the 7 foot PUE? If the 7 foot PUE is being vacated as well, please provide a legal description for that as well. a. Under "General Requirements" of the vacation application, it states that we need the following: 1 n l l d r .i ti RQW (GQMPl CTC) f th ega es = p s eR o e 2. A legal description for the PUEs (MISSING) 3. A legal description for the two lots affected before and after the vacation is complete(MISSING) Comments: oil he vielated by the pFepesed var=atien. nene be -1- 13. If the 7 foot PUE is also being vacated, we will need statements of concurrence. Please see the comments from Public Works department. a. I don't think we were explicit enough here, because we are missing a letter of concurrence from the Eugene Water and Electric Board for the vacation of the PUE (MISSING). b. The tax lot number is incorrect on the utility company concurrence form for NWN and Vacation Completeness Review Form Page 2 of 3