code at that time. In fact, as recited in the City's SR 88-11 written decision, there were only four <br />approval standards, which addressed the overall nature and operation of the development. Thus, <br />as shown in the image below, the 1988 Plans set forth only the building's footprint, access, on- <br />site traffic flow, parking layout, and the location of a few other basic elements. <br />Images from the Approved "COBURG CROSSING" Site Plans <br />,PYL i" riC~r:Ub'4 N7 SIL ~1 <br />540?KO PARCEL <br />ac Es <br />LANDSCAPING I. S (.E-A1%LK 4[7 <br />PARCEL -I <br />~p J', 6NTc[~ tSt cliL~,' <br />`lit. <br />.-T; AFF <br />lC..FLOW DHRE <br />°3 <br />4RCEI <br />L <br />. <br />. <br />- • - <br />. <br /> <br />i <br />51~a SI;;Id <br />7 V%CEL BOU.ti---~ARIt S <br />..G s PARCEL ' 2 <br />D. Criteria and the Director's Decision. <br />The criteria for the Application are found in EC 9.8455, titled "Modifications to <br />Approved Site Review Plans." Pursuant to this section, the "planning director shall approve the <br />[Application] if it complies with the following criteria:" <br />"(1) The proposed modification is consistent with the conditions <br />of the original approval. <br />Page 10 - WinCo Foods, LLC's Response to Appellants' Statements of Alleged Errors <br />MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4816-6071-2143.6 <br />TELEPHONE: 503.224.5858 <br />3400 U.S. BANCORP TOWER <br />I11 S.W FIFTH AVENUE <br />P ORTLAND. OREGON 97204 <br />