Eugene Comprehensive Plan Employment Land Supply Study nor Whiteaker Refinement Plan's City <br />Policies/Strategies. The response fails to provide any findings supporting consistency with the Whiteaker Plan. <br />Please revise accordingly. <br />4. The response at EC 9.8865(4) is inadequate. Staff cannot draw positive findings from the conclusory statement. <br />The applicant appears to rely on contiguity. However, the siting requirements do not include contiguity. Further, <br />based on contiguity, R-1 would appear to be more appropriate based on the ratio of abutting zoning. <br />The Whiteaker Plan's implementation amended the Metro Plan. In this case, the application proposes to amend <br />the Whitaker Plan based on an amendment to the Metro Plan. Out of abundance of caution, staff recommend <br />submitting a Refinement Plan Amendment (RA) to support the conclusions throughout the Zone Change and <br />Metro Plan application package. At a minimum, specific, positive findings should be provided to support the <br />conclusions regarding refinement plan conformance. <br />15. Please provide a response to the following comments regarding the TPR analysis: <br />a) Please provide a basis for percentage of building area. Building area would seem to be a <br />function of proposed use/required parking/development standards. <br />b) Please explain the rational to arrive at the use split and proposed uses included in the worst- <br />case scenario. More evidence is needed to ensure the provided exercise provides an actual <br />worst-case. The S-W zone provides wide flexibility including hospitals, housing, schools, and <br />restaurants. Staff could envision a small shopping and restaurant development with housing <br />and offices while the example evaluated contemplates primarily office use. <br />c) The trip distribution does not evaluate the intersections of Grand Street and Railroad Blvd/1' <br />Ave nor Cross PI and Cross Street. Please explain the exclusion of these intersections. <br />d) PW requests further analysis supporting TPR conclusions, please contact Eric Favreau, Public <br />Works, for additional information (EFavreau@eugene-or.gov). <br />Legal Description <br />Submitted <br />Missing <br />Incomplete <br />N/A <br />16. Provided a legal description for each existing lot involved in the <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />requested change. (These descriptions must be typed on an 8-1/2 x 11" <br />white sheet of paper (no letterhead) so that it is suitable for recording.) <br />Comments <br />16. Please provide a legal description for all properties involved in the proposed application. Please also clearly <br />indicate which property each legal description is associated with. <br />Map Information <br />Submitted <br />Missing <br />Incomplete <br />N/A <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />17. Provided a map indicating the property involved in the request and <br />showing adjacent streets, alleys etc. <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />18. Provided a vicinity map showing the general area of the request and <br />indicating the specific property involved in the request. <br />Comments <br />For Staff Use Only - Referral Information <br />Yes <br />No <br />❑ <br />® <br />1. Route land use referral to Parks Planning <br />® <br />❑ <br />2. Is the right-of-way county maintained or does the traffic analysis address a street under Lane <br />County jurisdiction? If yes, route land use referral to Lane County Transportation and Lane County <br />Road Maintenance Planning. Game Farm Road <br />3. Other: <br />➢ Prep DLCD Notice. <br />➢ DLCD notice must be mailed once the zone change is complete and received by DLCD at least 35 days <br />prior to the public hearing. <br />Refinement Plan Amendment Completeness Review Form Page 3 of 3 <br />