5 <br />1 The property is owned by Homes for Good, which was previously was <br />z known as Housing and Community Services of Lane County. ER-39 (Rec-1199). <br />3 Homes for good acquired the property "for the purpose of building low income <br />4 housing there." ER-34 (Rec-494). Despite the intent of Homes for Good, the <br />5 applicant is Lombard Apartments, LLC, which proposes to construct 94 dwelling <br />6 units at market rate. Neighbors of the proposed development favored low-income <br />7 housing but opposed additional market-rate apartment complexes. See ER-35 <br />s (Rec-128) (1 can imagine that there is a need for market rate housing in some <br />9 markets, but surely you can see that the 8000 empty market rate apartments here in <br />Zo Eugene (according to our local Housing Authority in a report to the city council in <br />11 December of 2017) does not make Eugene a candidate for more of the same."); id. <br />12 ("What Eugene is in desperate need of is 15,000 reasonably-priced low-cost <br />13 housing units.... Building 94 market rate units will do nothing for the 15,000 <br />14 people in need of the low-cost housing, and will simply add to the glut of empty <br />15 units in the Eugene area."); ER-36 (Rec-194) ("Homes for Good could construct an <br />16 affordable housing development on this project that is in keeping with the goals of <br />17 the Greenway."); ER-37 (Rec-711) (Hulme: "our community needs affordable <br />Zs housing not more expensive, `market-rate' housing based on current vacancy rate <br />19 data."); ER-38 (Rec-1061) (Doug Curry: "we have a real need for affordable <br />20 family housing, and a big apartment complex doesn't seem to fill the bill, I <br />