CR Materials - Laserfiche WebLink

❑ ® 25. Is a Hazardous Materials Review application required? Comments: Street and.Public Access Way Requirements Submitted' -Missing Incomplete N/A 26. Identify the number of peak hour trips based on the likely development that will occur on all lots resulting from the land division. If the ® ❑ ❑ ❑ development will generate 100 or more trips during any peak hour, a Traffic Impact Analysis Review is required in accordance with 9.8650 - 9.8680. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 27. Show street names for all existing and proposed streets (public and private) and identify the street classification. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 28. Indicate potential slope easements. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 29. Delineate any street segments where grade exceeds 15% percent, where driveways are prohibited. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 30. Provide a street center profile using ground elevations of proposed streets at or exceeding 15% grade. 31. Show location and widths (right-of-way and paving width) of all existing ❑ ❑ ® ❑ and proposed streets, intersections, and bike and pedestrian access ways, both within the plat and adjacent to the lat. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 32. Show-existing and proposed curbs and-sidewalks on site and adjacent to property involved. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 33. Address EC 9.6815 Street Connectivity and provide supporting narrative or if re uestin an exception, provide justifications. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 34. Show that the proposal is consistent with Eugene Code Section 9.6780, Vision Clearance Area. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 35. Indicate radii of all street curves on the plans. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 36. Show location and type of existing and proposed transit-related facilities. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 37. Show existing and proposed special setbacks, in accordance with Eugene Code Section 9.6750. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 38. Submit an Alternative Traffic Safety Study (ATSS) if an adjustment is request d to the required internal vehicle stacking at EC 9.6703(3)(a). ® El ❑ ❑ 39. Show all existing access driveways to the property. ❑ ® ❑ 40. Demonstrate that access to the development site is located in accordance with EC 7.420. 41. Submit an ATSS (or address in written statement) if requesting more than ❑ ® ❑ ❑ one access connection for a single development site and/or requesting that an access connection be wider than 20 feet. , ,,,.ati ; . 1 l d raft : erdanee •°4 EG 42 d t i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ e n -ne u e e f pe es r an . 9-6738. 27 - Proposed street name for N/S Connector Road? 31-Address how Table 9.6870 is met, include ROW width, paving width (curb to curb), for the proposed Comments' classification of the new street. 40/41- The site is currently undeveloped, and is subject to EC 9.6735(2)/EC 7.420. Please address in written statement. 42 - Per planning review: For Staff Use Only - Referral Inf6rmation Yes No ❑ 43. Does Parks Planning require a referral for this application? Yes, if j acent to a city ark. property is one acre or larger and ad 44. Is the right-of-way under Lane County jurisdiction? If yes, route land ❑ ® use referral to Lane County Transportation and Lane County Road Maintenance Planning. ® 45. Is a referral to PWM or PEPI required? Yes, if there are public improvements. 46. Does stormwater discharge to a facility' within Junction City Water ❑ Control District? If yes, route land use referral to Junction City Water Control District, Attn: Steve Cornacchia. Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Revised 6/2015 Page 3 of 4