CR Materials - Laserfiche WebLink

comments (32) Please clarify if more than 20 people will be employed and if a van pool or car pool area is proposed. Street and Utility Improvement Requirements ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 33. Show that utility plans comply with Eugene Code Section 9.6775, Underground Utilities. Landscaping Requirements Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 34. Location, species, and size of existing and proposed landscaping shown. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 35. Indicates means of irrigation. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 36. Open space and landscaping proposed for open space areas shown. Tree Preservation Requirements Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A 37. Provided a tree preservation plan prepared by a certified arborist or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ approved equivalent. Included both a narrative description and a corresponding site plan to address tree preservation criterion. 38. Healthy trees that have a reasonable chance of survival considering ❑ ❑ ® ❑ the base zone or special area zone and other applicable approval criteria. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 39. Trees located within vegetated corridors and stands rather than individual isolated trees subject to windthrow. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 40. Trees that fulfill a screening fuhction, provide relief from glare;'or shade expansive areas of pavement. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 41. Trees that provide a buffer between potentially incompatible land uses. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 42. Trees located along the perimeter of the lot(s) and within building setback areas. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 43. Trees and stands of trees located along ridgelines and within view corridors. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 44. Trees with significant habitat value. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ' 45. Trees adjacent to public parks, open space and streets. ❑ . ❑ ® ❑ 46. Trees along water features ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 47. Heritage trees. From aerial photographs it appears that there are three trees near the building noted as "off-site building to remain," Sheet L-000 provides details that indicate the trees are proposed for removal, while the written Comments statement indicates that there are no significant trees on site. Please adjust the site plan, or written narrative to address the inconsistency and clarify if an arborist has been involved in determining feasibility of preservation, or if an exception to the requirement for an arborist is requested. . Natural Features-Assessme nt and Delineation of Applicable Boundaries on Site Plan Submitted; Missing Incomplete' N/A 48. Significant on-site vegetation, including rare plants (those that are ❑ ❑ ❑ ® proposed for listing or are listed under State or Federal law), and native plant communities shown. 49. All documented habitat for all rare animal species (those that are ❑ ❑ ❑ ® proposed for listing or are listed under State or Federal law) are shown. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 50. Prominent topographic features, such as ridgelines and outcrops, shown. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 51. Wetlands, intermittent and perennial stream corridors, and riparian areas shown. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 52. Natural resource areas designated in the Metro Plan diagram as " "Natural Resource and areas identified in any city-adopted natural Tentative Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Page 3.of 4