My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments submitted 4-30-18 to 6-11-18
>
OnTrack
>
CA
>
2018
>
CA 18-1
>
Public Comments submitted 4-30-18 to 6-11-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2018 4:12:55 PM
Creation date
7/20/2018 4:08:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CA
File Year
18
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
Secondary Dwellings (Phase 1 Implementation of SB 1051)
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
6/11/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Answered: 69 Skipped:0 <br />Strongly agree <br />Moderately <br />agree <br />Neither agree <br />a <br />nor disagree <br />-A I <br />Moderately <br />- <br />disagree <br />Strongly <br />disagree <br />No opinion <br />Need more <br />information <br />0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100{ <br />(The Lane County Planning Commission has recommended that the County Commission allow <br />SDUs to be built on unannexed properties within the Urban Growth Boundary (about 2/3 of <br />single family lots in River Road and 1/3 of Santa Clara) without an owner living in one of the <br />units. This could create a difference for our neighborhoods if Eugene retains the owner- <br />occupied requirement for the rest of the City.) <br />Q3. Should owners of unannexed properties within the UGB be allowed to build SDUs <br />without annexing? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.