affect how you and your neighbors use your property. <br />Las, year the Oregon Legislature passed SB1051 which requires both Lane County and Eugene <br />to adopt changes to how they permit the construction of SDUs. Some changes are already <br />,~j ~,Liriuur ~l Gay thu EuguEE : City Cuurtcii. The Larie Cow ity Cut fanission will be considering <br />C'hann(-q nn JiinF ?7th. This gi~estionnaire seeks the opinion of River Road residents on some <br />of the changes they're considering. The responses will be anonymously summarized and <br />„i Id, uu vvii: i Ll Iu Cvui iuu cA iu Cui I it Ih6L: iul f. i='ic:a5~ am>Y%iQ i it 110 urwe it" you live, Uwn property or <br />own/work at a business in the River Road neighborhood. <br />Q1. How do you feel about continuing the requirement for properties with SDUs that <br />either the primary or secondary unit be owner occupied? <br />Answered: 69 Skipped:0 <br />Strongly <br />Support <br />Moderately <br />Support <br />Neutral <br />Moderately <br />Oppose <br />Strongly Oppose <br />No Opinion' <br />Need More <br />Information <br />0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100% <br />(Currently Eugene requires that on lots that have SDUs, either the primary house or the SDU <br />rr~uvt E}c Uv~rlci-uccupitu. Tlio~u vv ho suppur th;& rule argue tl-gat this curbs problems with <br />absentee landlords, Those who oppose this rule point out that approximately '/z of Eugene's <br />residences are rentals so this rule significantly reduces the opportunity to build SDUs in <br />Eugene.) <br />Q2: How do you feel about allowing SDUs to be built on unannexed properties in River <br />Road without one unit being owner occupied? <br />