My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments submitted 4-30-18 to 6-11-18
>
OnTrack
>
CA
>
2018
>
CA 18-1
>
Public Comments submitted 4-30-18 to 6-11-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2018 4:12:55 PM
Creation date
7/20/2018 4:08:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CA
File Year
18
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
Secondary Dwellings (Phase 1 Implementation of SB 1051)
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
6/11/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
affect how you and your neighbors use your property. <br />Las, year the Oregon Legislature passed SB1051 which requires both Lane County and Eugene <br />to adopt changes to how they permit the construction of SDUs. Some changes are already <br />,~j ~,Liriuur ~l Gay thu EuguEE : City Cuurtcii. The Larie Cow ity Cut fanission will be considering <br />C'hann(-q nn JiinF ?7th. This gi~estionnaire seeks the opinion of River Road residents on some <br />of the changes they're considering. The responses will be anonymously summarized and <br />„i Id, uu vvii: i Ll Iu Cvui iuu cA iu Cui I it Ih6L: iul f. i='ic:a5~ am>Y%iQ i it 110 urwe it" you live, Uwn property or <br />own/work at a business in the River Road neighborhood. <br />Q1. How do you feel about continuing the requirement for properties with SDUs that <br />either the primary or secondary unit be owner occupied? <br />Answered: 69 Skipped:0 <br />Strongly <br />Support <br />Moderately <br />Support <br />Neutral <br />Moderately <br />Oppose <br />Strongly Oppose <br />No Opinion' <br />Need More <br />Information <br />0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100% <br />(Currently Eugene requires that on lots that have SDUs, either the primary house or the SDU <br />rr~uvt E}c Uv~rlci-uccupitu. Tlio~u vv ho suppur th;& rule argue tl-gat this curbs problems with <br />absentee landlords, Those who oppose this rule point out that approximately '/z of Eugene's <br />residences are rentals so this rule significantly reduces the opportunity to build SDUs in <br />Eugene.) <br />Q2: How do you feel about allowing SDUs to be built on unannexed properties in River <br />Road without one unit being owner occupied? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.