EC 9.5500(11)(b)2. Adjustment per EC 9.8030(8) <br /> EC 9.5500(12)(b)1. Adjustment per EC 9.8030(8)(f) <br /> EC 9.5500(12)(c) Adjustment per EC 9.8030(8)(f) <br /> EC 9.6735(2) <br /> EC 9.6105(2)(b)2. Adjustment per EC 9.8030(9) <br /> EC 9.4290(3) <br /> <br />It is also important to note that staff provided completeness review comments to the applicant <br />requesting <br />not provide all of the requested information, but asked that the application be deemed complete <br />nonetheless according to their right to do so under State law. The lack of additional information <br />from the applicant has generated the need for conditions of approval for site plan changes, and <br />the potential need for one or more additional Adjustment Review applications. Each of these <br />items is discussed in detail under the applicable approval criterion. <br /> <br />Application Referrals and Public Hearing Notice <br />Public notice of the current applications was mailed on May 25, 2018 in accordance with EC <br />9.7315. Although not required by the land use code, staff placed additional signage along the bike <br />path. <br /> <br />The Planning Division has received a significant volume of testimony in opposition of the <br />Much of this testimony is related to anticipated off-site traffic impacts and <br />environmental impacts, and issues related to the sale of the subject parcels. A summary of key <br />issues raised, followed by a staff response, is provided in an attachment to this report (see <br />Attachment E). <br /> <br />The Planning Division also provided information concerning the application to other appropriate <br />City departments, public agencies, service providers, and the affected neighborhood group. All <br />referral comments received by the Planning Division on this application are included in the <br />application file for reference, and addressed in the context of applicable approval criteria and <br />standards in the following evaluation. <br /> <br />ORS 197.303 Argument <br />Greenway Permit approval criteria are subordinate to ORS 197.303 (the needed housing statute). <br />The applicant asserts that the approval criteria for the Willamette River Greenway (EC 9.8815) are <br />subordinate to ORS 197.303, and appears to imply that the applicant need not address the criteria <br />in EC 9.8815 at all. That said, the applicant has applied for the Willamette Greenway Permit and <br />addresses the criteria in EC 9.8815 as part of the Willamette Greenway application. Accordingly, <br />s compliance with EC 9.8815 in the following report. <br /> <br />criteria (and, by extension, the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 15: Willamette River <br />Greenway) somehow being subordinate to the needed housing statute. In this case, the subject <br />property is clearly within the boundaries of the Willamette River Greenway established locally <br />under the authority of Statewide Planning Goal 15, and those regulations are implemented, in <br /> <br />Lombard Apartments (WG 18-3/SR 18-3/ARA 18-8) June 2018 3 <br /> <br />