My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Additional PublicTestimony submitted 3-21-18
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Additional PublicTestimony submitted 3-21-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2018 4:12:59 PM
Creation date
4/2/2018 8:29:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
3/21/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
489
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment C <br />GIOELLO Nick R <br />Attachment B <br />From: Paul Conte <paul.t.conte@gmail.com> <br />Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 8:30 AM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R <br />Subject: Testimony: Hard evidence that sidewalks are critical for pedestrian safety (Part 2) <br />Nick, <br />Please add this e-mail to the record for the Capital Hill PUD Tentative. <br />From the previously submitted document: <br />Pedestrian safety : A road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners <br />World Health Organization (c) 2013 <br />Page 5 of Module 1: <br />"The risk of a motor vehicle colliding with a pedestrian increases in proportion to the <br />number of motor vehicles interacting with pedestrians (8,9)." <br />Page 20 of Module 1: <br />"Pedestrian risk is increased when roadway design and land-use planning fail to plan for and provide <br />facilities such as sidewalks, or adequate consideration of pedestrian access at intersections (4,62- <br />64). Infrastructure facilities and traffic control mechanisms that separate pedestrians from motor <br />vehicles and enable pedestrians to cross roads safely are important mechanisms to ensure <br />pedestrian safety, complementing vehicle speed and road system management." <br />References for Module 1: <br />4. Zegeer CV, Bushell M. Pedestrian crash trends and potential countermeasures from around <br />the world. <br />Accident Analysis EL Prevention, 2012, 44:3-11. <br />8. Jacobsen PL. Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. <br />Injury Prevention, <br />2003, 9: 205-209. <br />9. Etvik R, et at. The handbook of road safety measures, 2nd ed. Bingley, Emerald Group <br />Publishing Limited, 2009. <br />62. Tiwari G. Reducing pedestrian risk at junctions. In: Volvo Research and Educational <br />Foundations, ed. 10 years <br />with the FUT programme. Goteborg, Volvo Research and Educational Foundations, 2011: <br />126-135. <br />63. Ewing R, Dumbaugh E. The built environment and traffic safety: a review of empirical <br />evidence. Journal of <br />Planning Literature, 2009, 23: 347-367. <br />64.Sleet DA, Naumann RB, Rudd RA. Injuries and the built environment. In: Dannenberg AL <br />et at. eds. Making <br />healthy places: designing and building for health, well-being and sustainobility. <br />Washington, DC, Island Press, <br />2011: 77-79. <br />1 <br />Page 123 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.