My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2018 10:39:26 AM
Creation date
3/12/2018 10:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/7/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
atmosphereandproposestoremovealargenumberoftreesfromthetopofCapitalHill.The <br />remainingtreeswilllikelynotsurvivewhenexposedtohighwindsontheridgelineasdiscussed <br />inmoredetailinCriteria4. <br />TheApplicationimproperlyclaimsthatHendricksParkwillscreentheproposedCHPUDonthe <br />northernboundary,wheninreality,theApplicationproposescreatingnewlotsthatwillabut <br />directlyagainsttheParkboundary.ThetreecuttingproposedbytheCHPUDwouldcause <br />windthrowonthesouthernboundaryofHendricksParkthatwillovertimespreadintothePark. <br />TheApplicationclaimsthattheplantingofnewtreeswillcompensateforthefellingoflarge, <br />stabletrees,whichismisleading,asthetreepreservationplanproposesreplacinglargemature <br />treesupto60inchesindiameterwithasmalltreehavingadiameterof1.5inches. <br />TheApplication'sTreePreservationPlanproposesextensivetreeremovalasfollows: <br />Of867totaltreeswithinthesite,466willeitherberemovedwiththeconstructionof <br />theROW(rightofway)orarelistedas"discretionary",meaningtheyarewithinthe <br />buildableareaofthelotsandmayberemovedbythenewowneronceindividual <br />homeconstructionstarts. <br />ManyofthelargestfirtreesontheproposedCHPUDsite,someinexcessof40 <br />inchesindiameter,willbedestroyedfortheROWconstructionorhomeconstruction. <br />Atotalof257treesarelocatedabove901'.Onlyfourofthesetreesareconserved. <br />Justoneofthefourisaconiferoustree-afirtree. <br />Thesitecurrentlyhasatotalof82verylargetrees(36inchesindiameterorgreater) <br />existontheproposedsite.Ofthese,19wouldbeconserved.Theproposalsindicates <br />justone36inchesorlargerwouldbeproposedontheridgelineabove901'.(TreeNo. <br />41535inlot4) <br />Aswewilldemonstrateinourdiscussionof EC9.8320(4),69%ofalltrees21inches <br />orgreaterindiametermayberemoved. <br />TheApplicationdescribes401treesconservedonsite.Thevastmajorityofthesearein <br />"conserved"areasonprivatepropertyfardownontheeasternslopenexttotheRibbonTrailor <br />withintheHOAConservationArea. <br />TheApplicationTreePreservationPlanfailsto“assurepreservationofsignificanton-site <br />vegetation,topographicfeatures,andotheruniqueandworthwhilefeatures”asdefinedinthe <br />LaurelHillPlan.InadoptingtheSouthHillsStudystandards,theLaurelHillPlanrecognizesthe <br />importanceofthe“evergreen”ridgelineasanimportanttopographicalfeaturethattheCHPUD <br />applicationwouldnotprotect. <br />IntheTreePreservationsectionoftheApplication’sWrittenStatementregardingtree <br />preservation,theapplicationstates(p.36of67),“\[the\]portionofthiscodecriterionthatneeds <br />dueconsiderationisthephrase‘consideringthebasezone.’”TheApplicationimproperly <br />concludesthatthebasezoneabrogatestherelevanceandimportanceoftherefinementoverlay <br />zonesandstudies,i.e.,theLaurelHillPlanandtheSouthHillsStudy.However,refinement <br />zoneswerecreatedtofurtherdefine—orrefine—theneedsofspecificareaswhenthecodesfor <br />thebasezoneareinadequatetoprotecttheparticularneedsofcertainareas.Asstatedabove,and <br />32 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.